Judge Kronstadt ORDERS immigrants receive Mental Health Services

  By ,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

Yet Judge Kronstadt throws book at elderly disabled Brain injured American Citizen on “NO” Victims case!

“In a groundbreaking order U.S. District Judge John A. Kronstadt has ordered the federal government to provide immediate mental health screenings and treatment to thousands of immigrant families who were traumatized by the Trump Administration’s family separation policy,” says Public Counsel.

Public Interest Concern:  Why has Kronstadt induced inhumane and discriminatory treatment against Jeffrey Dean Moffatt, by NOT providing Moffatt to Stay out on Bail Pending his Appeal?

Moffatt, is a Coma Survivor, having severe neurological physical Traumatic Brain Injury, with Frontal Lobe Damage, Brain Tumor, Cysts forming inside of his Brain, Environmental Asthma and other medical conditions and elderly at age 62?

Why is Kronstadt not providing the same humane treatment to Moffatt, as Kronstadt has done, with illegal immigrant families?

Kronstadt’s motives are UnAmerican intentional mental and physical Torture schemes to ORDER physically disabled U.S. Citizen, (Moffatt) to prison for 12 months and one day is beyond inhumane when there are “NO”  victims or violence against any person[s] on Count 6.

Because Count 6 was never charged by Federal Grand Jurors, within the purported Federal Grand Jury Indictment filed 7-23-2021.

Tap on the below Link to hear Country song written by: Star Moffatt at: https://youtube.com/shorts/s2pcR0KmgWc?si=YfJV_ey0biVM6xSo

Why the disparate treatment against American Citizen Moffatt and favoritism to illegal immigrant families?  Moffatt was even arrested on 9-3-2021, while duly admitted Court Officer-Federal Attorney, within the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from Oct 3, 2007 – January 2026, Exh #1004.

Moffatt was also arrested on 9-3-2021, while SSA had an open Appeal from 2017-2024,  constitutionally challenging Administrative Law Judges, (ALJ’s), unlawfully seated, within SSA, among other issues. 

Even Arrest Warrants called for Moffatt to be arrested by U.S. Marshals, however, findings later revealed Moffatt was arrested by the County of Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office and a Social Security Employee named: Alejandro Ibarra!  None of the individuals were ever deputized by U.S. Marshals, to arrest Moffatt.  Arrest Warrants were not even signed off by a Judge.  Moffatt was transported in a State agency owned registered vehicle.

Now the clock is ticking down on Kronstadt’s inhumane -UnAmerican treatment ORDER against Moffatt, by imposing that Moffatt voluntarily Self-Surrender on 9-30-26, Wednesday.

Wife to Jeffrey Moffatt (Star) says why the inhumane treatment by Kronstadt, against her “beloved husband,” 36 years, but Kronstadt gives  humane treatment to illegal immigrant families separated by ICE?   How difficult is it to allow  Jeffrey to Stay out on Bail Pending Appeal before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. 

Let’s not forget David C. Lachman, Prosecutor (AUSA) also denied Jeff to “Stay out on Bail,” to attend funeral services of his recently found dead Mother!

Novice readers be sure to click on areas highlighted to download and read other documents!

Attorney under fire by the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board

  By ,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Stefanie Lambert Junttila, Attorney is under fire by the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board.   The Board subjected Junttila, to a public hearing: (Prehearing Conference), back on August 14, 2026, Friday, sending a signal to protect the public.

Many other Attorney Discipline Boards should model themselves after the State of Michigan Discipline Board.   

One of the complainants’ named: Dalene Tyler, reached out to Moffatt Media and said that Junttila, ripped her off with providing “Ineffective Assistance of Counsel,” to defend her mentally disabled Nephew, who got 260 years in a State prison, when there are “NO” Victims.  Question for reasonable minded observers, what person even lives to 260 years old?

Tyler went on to also say she paid $15,000.00 of her life savings to Junttila, who did not get what she bargained for with adequately representing her Nephew and wants her hard life savings back!  Tyler said she signed a Retainer Agreement with Junttila while her Nephew was behind the deplorable prison bars.

Tyler says that her Nephew is a victim himself who suffered childhood trauma with being sexually exploited as a child, that went untreated without receiving mental health services even into adulthood and her Nephew has been wrongfully convicted!

On October 10, 2018, Dr. Zwemer conducted a Clinical Psychological Forensic Report on her Nephew.  “He was referred to the present examiner on petition of defense counsel, James Ellenson Esquire, by ORDER of Honorable W. Richard Savage, III.”  Amazingly, October 10, of each year is also “World Mental Health Day.” Tyler says when reflecting back in time she thanks Judge Savage, for recognizing her Nephew’s Mental Health Issues.

However, according to Tyler the court failed to uphold her Nephew’s protection covered under the Americans Disability Act (ADA), who should have never been sentenced to 260 years in prison.  Tyler defines the sentence of 260 years as crimes against humanity imposed with cruel punishment against her Nephew.

Moffatt Media’s findings reveal that the Court is defined as a public entity in 42 U.S. Code Section 12131(1)(B) and while in receipt of Federal Funding, the Court may NOT induce discriminatory practices against ANY persons with disabilities, which include Tyler’s Nephew.

This is a developing story.   Moffatt Media reached out to Stefanie Lambert Junttila, at telephone number 313-513-9474, listed by AVVO, which did not answer for Junttila.

This article will continue to be updated as more information becomes available!  Next administrative hearing date for Junttila is on October 22, 2026, stay tuned.

Thank you in advance for sharing this article with your family and friends because every share helps bring Dalene Tyler’s,  Nephew’s story and other stories like this into the light about the alleged  “Ineffective Assistance of Counsel,” by Stefanie Lambert Junttila, Michigan Attorney.

###

Arizona Lawyers charged by the State Bar of Arizona “not” disbarred for Sexual Harassment’s against clients and others

  By

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Updated 1/4/2025, Sunday

Arizona Lawyers not disbarred for Sexual Harassment’s or Sexual Assaults.

But if an Arizona Lawyer asks for a “PIC” from a NON-LEGAL client he or she will find themselves Disbarred.

Reasonable observers would agree that SEX and LAW do NOT mix.  Contrary to the State Bar of Arizona, because they give get out of Jail Free Cards to their favored Lawyers even when charged to have committed Sexual Harassment’s against clients and others.

One Arizona Lawyer NOT disbarred asked one of his clients: “During the initial interview, Piatt asked her whether she had ever masturbated at the age of fourteen.”   … “even better if her skirt were four inches shorter.”

Did you know the Arizona Bar allows its Lawyers to have SEX with Prospect Legal Clients under its Ethical Rule 1.8(j) Rule? But asking for a “PIC,” will get an Arizona Lawyer Disbarred, law degree, undergraduate college degrees and legal careers wiped out overnight; along with livelihood destroyed.    Arizona lawyers are denied equal access to justice and when charged NOT given a Jury Trial among their peers.

Did you also know that the Arizona Bar even offers “Get out of Jail Free Cards,” and no Disbarments against Arizona Lawyers and Judges who commit Sexual Harassment’s and Sexual Misconduct?

Justice Hijacked through Sexual Misconduct so long as consensual SEX freak offs are done before AZ Lawyer signs a Retainer Contract with a Prospect Legal client? See AZ Bar, Rule 42 ER 1.8(j), and too mean ER: Ethical Rule.  See Ethical Rule (Policy-Guideline) Section 1.8(j) at: https://web.archive.org/web/20230307052151/https://www.azbar.org/for-lawyers/ethics/rules-of-professional-conduct/

“Well connected attorneys and judges who have actually engaged in sexual misconduct were only censured, put on probation, or suspended 1-2 years,” NEVER DISBARRED,”  ̴The Rachel Alexander Show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bLmfCnkhHU

 

Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #1 –

  • CHARNA JOHNSON

“Johnson claimed to communicate with the dead, and had sexual contact with a client.”  Johnson was merely “suspended from the practice of law for one year and ordered to serve two years of probation upon reinstatement.”     Johnson was NOT Disbarred.

See Source:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160708053153/http://www.azbar.org/newsevents/newsreleases/2010/10/suspensionrecommendedforattorneywhowasallegedtohavechanneledthedead

Other Source:

Published July 24, 2025 – https://moffattmedia.com/sex-with-prospect-legal-clients-is-allowed-by-the-state-bar-of-arizona/

 

Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #2

  • JUDGE TED ABRAMS – NOT DISBARRED
    William J. O’Neil, Arizona Supreme Court PDJ-(ALJ), merely suspended Abrams for two years and barred him from being a judge. Here is Abrams’ extensive history of sexual harassment, as reported by The AZ Central:

During a 14-month period, the judge sent the unidentified public defender at least 28 voicemails and 85 text messages, many of which were sexually suggestive (at least one was, he admitted, “obscene,” and described a sex act he wanted to perform on her), repeatedly pressured her for sex, made slurping noises and at one point fondled her buttock. In response, the public defender said she wasn’t interested, repeatedly told him that it would be inappropriate for them to have a relationship because he was a judge, she worked in his courtroom and he was married. She called him “crazy and disgusting.”

Abrams, 47, also had a sexual relationship with another attorney, a private defense lawyer who appeared in his court, and he sent sexually explicit e-mails to a third attorney, an assistant city prosecutor who appeared in his court.

The state bar brief said the judge “victimized a young lawyer for his own personal gratification and when she did not enjoy, welcome or otherwise relent to his constant requests for sexual contact, he berated and humiliated her from the bench during a jury trial.” The victim also said Abrams told her that it would not be good for her career if she rejected his advances. After the short suspension, it appears that he is about to be reinstated to the Arizona bar.

See Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20160709180555/http://archive.azcentral.com/news/articles/20110604arizona-supreme-court-suspends-ted-abrams.html

 

Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #3

  • MATTHEW SCHULTZ
    Attorney Matthew Schultz admitted he had a sexual relationship with a client, and was just suspended for one year.

See Source:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140828180251/http://www.azbar.org/newsevents/newsreleases/2014/08/matthewsschultzsuspension/

 

Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #4

  • ROBERT STANDAGE
    Government attorney Robert Standage… actually did send sexual images and videos to an existing client. He was already on probation for a previous incident, but Judge O’Neil merely suspended him for two years.  See Court Case NO.: PDJ 2015-9007 – SBA File #14-0367 Filed 06-29-2015.

See Source:

https://web.archive.org/web/20161226184003/http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/101/Standage%20Web.pdf

  

Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #5

  • FRED ACKEL JUDGE PUNISHED BY ARIZONA SUPREME CT

Fred Ackel, another judge, was punished by the Arizona Supreme Court for his sexual misbehavior with a mere censure. Not even suspension, probation, etc.

A litigant who appeared in front of Ackel to stop a man from harassing her, was — ironically — so disturbed by the judge’s constant sexual remarks and attempt to have a romantic relationship with her, that she started tape recording him. His comments about sex were extraordinarily vulgar. Perhaps most disturbing, he told her in regards to the man harassing her, “If I have to raise some more hell, I’ll have him arrested.”

The court said in its opinion, “We agree with the Commission that Ackel’s conduct toward Randall constituted willful misconduct.” The court also noted that he’d had six prior complaints — and one they considered an aggravating factor, where he had called a female attorney during a pretrial conference “darling,” and commented on her legs. In fact, the court found a second aggravating factor, “Ackel’s regular use of endearing terms toward and physical contact with women.” See Source https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/supreme-court/1987/87-0001-2.html

 

Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #6

  • WILLIAM M. PIATT, IV

Piatt Censured and probation for Sexual Harassment against two clients. (Not Disbarred)

“During the initial interview, Piatt asked her whether she had ever masturbated at the age of fourteen.   In a later meeting, he told her she looked delicious and that it would be even better if her skirt were four inches shorter.’ … See Source: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/az-supreme-court/1453902.html

 

Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #7

  • WILLIAM J. WALKER

Walker an attorney was “censured for touching a client’s breast.” (NOT disbarred). See Source:

https://www.studicata.com/summaries/supreme-court-of-arizona/in-the-matter-of-walker-2001-4mbein/

 

Arizona Lawyer (Prosecutor) SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #8

  • NANCY DEAN, Prosecutor had an affair with MICHALE C. NELSON Superior Court Judge.

Dean was placed on six month suspension and Judge Nelson resigned. (Not Disbarred).   See Source:

https://www.azapp.com/blog/in-the-matter-of-dean-3-28-2006/

 

Arizona Lawyer (Prosecutor) SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #9

  • JUAN MARTINEZ

“The complaint involved allegations that Martinez sexually harassed women he worked with at the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office.”

“In 2019, the State Bar filed a formal complaint against Martinez alleging misconduct.” …

Martinez, Consented to Disbarment and was NOT disbarred.

But the most eye-opening eyebrow raising disciplinary measure meted out by the State Bar of Arizona, was the permanent disbarment of attorney Jeffrey Moffatt who had asked for a “pic” from a potential client named Lisa Childers in 2013, on Facebook and a pic that Moffatt never even received.   Childers filed a complaint against Moffatt and the State Bar of New Mexico took the matter under review concluding Childers was NOT legally a client and dismissed the matter for lacking jurisdiction.

Childers in 2016 confided via  Confession Audio Tape with the Carlsbad Police Department for  Felony political extortion schemes between her and felon boyfriend Hershal “Pat” Spurlin,” against Moffatt and his wife.

Three years later in April 2016, when Moffatt was running for a seat in the United States Congress as a Republican, the Arizona State Bar decided to throw the book at Moffatt, disbarring him from state practice of law.

To many following the Moffatt case, the conspicuously harsh treatment of Moffatt coupled with its timing occurring in the heat of a political campaign three years after the alleged incident occurred, sticks out like a sore thumb as a great injustice brought about by questionable means.

In the United States of America where the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution requires equal treatment under the law for all citizens, the treatment of Moffatt as compared to other legal professionals in the State of Arizona who have committed much more egregious acts, Moffatt’s treatment stands alone in its severity.

Moffatt’s law firm findings revealed that the Arizona State Bar exceeded jurisdiction and authority to disbar Moffatt.   This matter has been litigated in Federal Civil Court since 2017, because Moffatt filed a $10 Million lawsuit against the Arizona Bar, State Supreme Court of Arizona, State of Arizona and former Chief Justice Bales. The case is pending Reinstatement.

The question then becomes why the Disparate Treatment against Former Arizona Lawyer Jeffrey Dean Moffatt, because Moffatt asked for a “PIC”.”  Findings by Moffatt’s former law firm revealed the Decision and Order Imposing Sanctions and Final Judgment and Order of Disbarment, are fatally facially FRAUDULENT documents, because Presiding Disciplinary Judge aka Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), was “unlawfully seated.”

Perhaps it is time to take a look into Arizona Lawyers who have committed actual sexual offenses against clients … and give the same equal treatment of Disbarment retroactively similar to Moffatt.   Alternative remedies SUSPEND the Arizona Bar ER (Ethical Rule) 1.8(j), mirrored after the American Bar Association (ABA) and Reinstate Moffatt to the State Bar of Arizona.

###

SEX with prospect legal clients is allowed by the State Bar of Arizona did you know? But ask for a “PIC” will get you Disbarred

  By ,

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #1 – State Bar of Arizona (SBA), you didn’t disbar your Arizona Lawyer:  Charna Johnson.  You reported in part: “Johnson claimed to communicate with the dead, and had sexual contact with a client.”  Johnson was merely “suspended from the practice of law for one year and ordered to serve two years of probation upon reinstatement.”     Johnson was NOT Disbarred.

(SBA) lets refresh your memory in part from your Press Release:  

…“The State Bar of Arizona initiated an investigation after finding probable cause that Johnson had lied under oath in a disciplinary hearing, claimed to communicate with the dead, and had sexual contact with a client.” 

 “Johnson’s client claimed that she began to communicate his ex-wife’s thoughts to him and initiated ongoing communication with him as his wife. He also claimed that he and Johnson engaged in sexual conduct.”  … Again Johnson was NOT Disbarred.

SEX with prospect legal clients is allowed as long as the Lawyer has “consensual sex,” before signing a Retainer Agreement.   See State Bar of Arizona Ethical Rule 42 Section1.8 (j) reads in pertinent part:  

“[a] lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced.”

Yet Rule 42 Section 1.8((j) promotes Sexual Exploitation, Sexual Harassment’s, Sexual Assaults against court clerks, individuals who are already mentally and financially vulnerable when seeking legal help.  

1.8(j) allows an Arizona Lawyer to get their freak offs before signing a Retainer Agreement.   This pattern and practice of the 1.8(j) must be SUSPENDED and investigated immediately for societal immorality in preventing individuals from being targeted for SEX before signing a Retainer Agreement, with an Arizona Lawyer.    

(SBA) now compare with the other Arizona Lawyer who only jokingly asked for a mere “PIC” from a woman during his private time on Facebook, in 2013; the same woman who never became a legal client; and the same woman, wherein the State of New Mexico Carlsbad Police Department, were able to obtain Confession Audio Tapes, that the woman named: Lisa Childers and boyfriend Pat Hershal Spurlin, had committed $25k political extortion schemes against the Arizona Lawyer and his wife running for Senate.

Detective Brian Burke, advised that Spurlin accepted a Class Three Felony Charge.   Detective Burke then submitted to both the FBI and the District Attorney’s Office for filing Criminal charges in Report # S1602144. 

However, you State Bar of Arizona (SBA), Disbarred the other Arizona Lawyer for the mere asking of a “PIC,” during private time on Facebook.  Did you (SBA) forget Freedom of Speech is protected under both State and Federal Constitutional laws? Yet you criminally charged the other Arizona Lawyer under your Rule 8.4(b), criminal sui generis.

Watch and Listen at below YouTube Source Link to how William J. O’Neil, State Employee of the Supreme Court (FAKE JUDGE), who brags about  criminal sui generis proceedings.  See at footage: 2:26 and at 1.29 Introduced: “Judge William J. O’Neil, Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court here in Arizona,” said Little.

https://youtu.be/d1nUf5QE_0c

SBA, remember you gave your middle finger to the AZ House Legislatures Judiciary Committee, when they highly recommended that the State Supreme Court of Arizona, implement First Amendment Protections, for Arizona Lawyers.

Last time Moffatt Media checked an agency like the AZ Supreme Court, is in receipt of Federal Financial Assistance and must uphold First Amendment Constitutional protections for all individuals and persons also defined as Arizona Lawyers.

PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTIONS

 (SBA) why the favoritism treatment with Spotlight Case #1 Charna Johnson, who was only suspended for one year?

  • Disparate Treatment:  Why the Disparate Treatment against Jeffrey Dean Moffatt, with your purported Disbarment when Moffatt only asked for a “PIC” and did NOT f..king (have SEX), with the  Prospect Legal Client: Lisa Childers?

Maybe Moffatt would have been better off to have had SEX with prospective legal client Childers and Moffatt probably would have only been Suspended instead of Disbarred.

California State Bar –
Position the “California Bar” has taken to “ban” … “sex between lawyers and their clients.  See Reference Source by Associated Press:   

SEX BAN: “The sex ban has divided the rules revision commission, though similar restrictions are in place in other states. As of May 2015, 17 states had adopted a blanket sex ban drafted by the American Bar Association, according to an ABA committee that looked at implementation of the group’s ban.”

Source Link:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/27/california-considers-ban-on-sex-between-lawyers-and-clients.html

Jeffrey Dean Moffatt, Disparate Treatment Victim #2 induced 2016 Fraudulent Disbarment.  

###