Public Interest Concern: PUBLIC CORPORATION having a corporate name: The State Bar of California (SBC) has illegally investigated, charged and prosecuted Trump Adviser John Eastman. (SBC) proceedings against Eastman have been done before an unconstitutional illegal Court.
Eastman has been Illegally investigated, charged (administratively) and prosecuted by “CORPORATION,” State Bar of California, which is a non-governmental organization (NGO) “Public Corporation?”
The proceedings before (SBC) are illegal and administrative proceedings only against Eastman, because (SBC) is NOT a real court of law. The administrative proceedings are done by (SBC), which does NOT have to uphold State or Federal Constitutional laws that protect Eastman and other California Lawyer’s.
The California Constitution admits that the State Bar of California is only a public corporation. See California Constitution Article 6 Section 9, which reads in pertinent part: “[t]he State Bar of California is a Public Corporation.” …
Do you know the State Bar of California has NOT been delegated STATE POLICE PROSECUTORIAL POWERS? Only the County District Attorney’s Office usually conducts investigations to criminally charge people. Not a “Public Corporation.”
“This Court has held that delegations of regulatory power to private parties are impermissible, Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U. S. 238, 311 (1936), it held the delegation to be unconstitutional, 721 F. 3d, at 677.”
There have NOT been ANY amendments to the California Constitution to allow the public corporation State Bar of California (SBC) to receive prosecutorial or court powers to be recognized as an official “Court of Record,” or a prosecutorial agency similar to a District Attorney’s Office.
Shame on the State Supreme Court of California for going rogue in delegating your court powers to CORPORATION: The State Bar of California (SBC) .
It’s time to take back your wrongfully delegated regulatory powers to CORPORATION (SBC) and retain both jurisdiction and regulatory powers over California Lawyer’s. Failure by the State Supreme Court of California to take back wrongfully delegating powers outside of the California Constitution will continue to cause imminent public safety dangers to both consumers and California Lawyer’s.
PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTION
WHETHER the State Bar of California, has committed Prosecutorial Misconduct, against Eastman?
California Bar you’re now exposed and no longer permitted to conceal from the public your legendary myth inferring to be a licensing body when in fact only a mere “Public Corporation.”
The State Supreme Court of California nor the State of California can delegate prosecutorial or judicial powers to ANY “Public Corporation,” because “judicial power of this State is vested in the Supreme Court, courts of appeal, and superior courts, all of which are courts of record.”
“[t]his Court has held that delegations of regulatory power to private parties are impermissible, Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U. S. 238, 311 (1936), it held the delegation to be unconstitutional, 721 F. 3d, at 677. See Department of Transportation v Association of American Railroads 575 U.S 43 2015 Amtrak
Thus, an abhorrent appearance of “Conflict of Interest” exists between the State Supreme Court of California and the State Bar of California. The “Conflict of Interest” is problematic because it violates Constitutional Separation of Powers.
A conflict of interest scheme causes the Supreme Court to run afoul of the Separation of Powers, with (NGO), Public Corporation State Bar of California against Eastman.
Eastman’s own attorneys will NOT challenge the abhorrent constitutional conflict of interest in violation with Separation of Powers, between the Supreme Court and State Bar of California, are they too will find themselves DISBARRED!
To this end, the State Supreme Court of California, was the only licensing government body that issued Eastman lawyer’s license to practice law and hang his lawyer’s license on his wall of fame for public viewing.
Sidebar:
The power of history is in telling the truth: California 2020 admits spent $134mil Voting Machines outdated beyond repair.
Note areas highlighted in “purple” click on to read: supportive documents or sources of references.
###
Prosecutor Dirty COP “Unclean Hands” Weaponizes Indictment schemes against Mark Ridley Thomas and other American Citizens.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Prosecutor (Dirty COP) Tracy Wilkison had “Unclean Hands” when she impaneled Grand Juries, filed (FAKE) criminal Indictments and targeted American Citizens:
Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes “Life In Prison.” Sentencing August 28, 2023.
INDICTMENT: JEFF FORTENBERRY NEBRASA CONGRESSMAN GJ JUNE 2021
$30,000.00 alleged Foreign Campaign donation received in California. – Three counts of alleged False Statements to FBI agents. Federal Mandatory Minimum Statutes- Sentencing 15 years in prison. Convicted and Sentenced only two years probation with a $25,000 Fine. Fortenberry filed an Appeal, October 29, 2022.
9/3/2021 False and Illegal Arrest against Moffatt. Criminal Docket # cr 2:21-cr-00335-JAK-1
INDICTMENT: GRAND JURY CRIMINAL INDICTMENT AGAINST JEFF MOFFATT JUNE 2021
$30,000.00 SSA Disabled Attorney Fees Awarded, alleged Five Counts Wire Fraud and one Count False Statement to SSA. Series 1 Episode 1: Stay Tuned
Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes – 105 years in prison. Trial Scheduled October 24, 2023.
Moffatt Media has conducted Case Studies on several purported Indictments filed against American Citizens.
Our Findings reveal that Tracy Wilkison, Prosecutor Dirty COP with “Unclean Hands” Weaponized Indictment schemes against American Citizens.
Unless one is legally trained in Constitutional Law applicable to: (Appointment Clauses and Separation of Powers …), such (FAKE) Indictment schemes induced by Wilkison, Prosecutor-Dirty COP, would have gone unnoticed.
(FAKE) Indictments against: Thomas, Fortenberry and Moffatt:
1). Wilkison was NOT constitutionally seated as a United States Attorney for the Central District of California, at the time when Wilkison filed the Indictments against all (3) American Citizens: Thomas, Fortenberry and Moffatt;
2). Wilkison did NOT even affix her own signature onto ANY of the (3) (FAKE) Indictments, to make the Indictments as legally binding criminal charging documents, against all (3) American Citizens listed above;
3). According to the United States Department of Justice, (DOJ), even admitted in a Freedom of Information Act Request response, that Wilkison, had NOT been Appointed as a United States Attorney for the Central District of California;
4). Wilkison when Impaneled Grand Juries and submitted the (FAKE) Indictments before the Court, against all (3) American Citizens listed above, Wilkison, had not received ANY Presidential inherent power “Nomination,” from Former President Trump or President Biden, as a United States Attorney and Wilkison had NOT been Senate Confirmed.
5). November 16, 2021, Merrick Garland, United States Attorney General, for DOJ, Appointed Tracy Wilkison as the Interim (Acting Officer) United States Attorney for the Central District of California.
Wilkison filled the vacant seat that was previously held by Nicola Hanna, United States Attorney – Central District. Hanna did receive a Presidential Nomination by Former President Trump and was Senate Confirmed, as a United States Attorney.
6). Wilkison even failed to indicate on the (FAKE) Indictments against all three (3) American Citizens: Thomas, Fortenberry and Moffatt, what Federal agency was her employer, having jurisdiction on the alleged Indictments; and
7). July 2022, Wilkison (RESIGNED) from the US DOJ and entirely from the Federal government sector. It is suspected that Wilkison’s resignation was prompted due to violating the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1988 (Vacancies Act). 5 U.S. Code Section 3348. …
Tracy Wilkison, Prosecutor who became a Dirty COP and committed acts of Prosecutorial Misconduct, developed schemes to undermine our criminal justice system.
Wilkison conspired and targeted American Citizens by filing (FAKE) fraudulent Indictments into the United States District Court – Central District of California.
Keeping in mind, not one of the above listed three (3) American Citizens have committed ANY violent offenses against the United States of America or violent offenses against ANY persons defined as victims.
Consequently, the Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes of One-Size-Fits-All, lopsided Federal laws, all three (3) American Citizens, are facing a two-tiered unequal justice system, that will significantly adversely impact their lives, with the loss of livelihoods, costly college degrees down the toilets, loss of life, liberty and freedoms on alleged non-violent offenses and (FAKE) Indictments, how UnAmerican.
Even all three (3) American Citizens, their families, friends and supporters’ lives they too will be shattered unless the (FAKE) INDICTMENTS are promptly investigated and summarily dismissed by the United States District Court – Central District of California, because Wilkison was NOT constitutionally seated, and committed illegal Indictment schemes not in accordance with Federal laws.
PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTION
Did you know Federal District Court Judge’s hands are usually tied when Sentencing under Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes?
To this end, unless United We Stand against the Unconstitutional (FAKE) Fraudulent Indictments against all three (3) American Citizens, listed above, they will face unjust Court Lynchings, by the United States of America, based on Wilkison Prosecutor- Dirty COP, (FAKE) Indictments and Grand Jury Schemes.
Alert: You could be next facing a (FAKE) Indictment, because Weaponization against American Citizens does not discriminate!
Share this Real Talk- Real Fact Story, in front of three (3) persuadable people that you know, because it’s NOT about whether one is Republican or Democrat, it is about doing the right thing to expose unjust and lopsided Federal laws in America.
It is also about exposing Tracy Wilkison, United States Department of Justice (DOJ) Dirty COP, who has stained the fabric of good COP’s!
###
Why am I so happy and content that Trump has been indicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida?
I think it goes a long way to proving how false and prejudicial the “justice system” really is.
I am happy because I think Donald J. Trump is in good company (namely me) and so am I (in good company, namely Trump). Remember the saying “when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns?”
Well, how about extending that a little bit more broadly: “when being a good, normal, freeman is outlawed, only outlaws will be good and normal freeman.” I feel vindicated in my life. On December 7, 1999, I was indicted and felt it ruined my life. I never did a split second of jail time for that indictment, but it did ruin my career. But it was all political HOT AIR.
I am now no less competent to run for President than the best President of recent memory, possibly the freest and most normal, uncompromised President since JFK (and, of course, JFK was SOOO inconvenient that they shot him—to replace him by one of the worst and most detested Presidents ever, namely LBJ). No, I’m not a saint, neither is Donald John Trump, neither was JFK. All three of us are/were oversexed womanizers with deep-seated disrespect for social norms and “the powers that be.”
And now, on June 9, 2023, Trump finds himself indicted in the Court where I was a judicial law clerk thirty years ago when his bankruptcy was the first case that came across my desk. The American Criminal Justice System is really and truly criminal. But in all other ways it betrays its name: it is UNAmerican, INjust, and “systematic” only in its betrayal of the constitution and all concepts of equity and fairness.
Donald John Trump: welcome to the real American Heart of Darkness.
Since you would not give up your quest to make America Great Again, even though you and I may not agree about exactly what it takes to Make America Great Again, they have set out to destroy you, just as they did me back in 1999.
You were a rising star then in 1999—I was cut off before I turned 40.
But this is the real purpose of the American Criminal Justice System: to shut down our people and to destroy America once and for all!
God Bless and Save you, Donald John Trump! You and all other righteous men and women who find themselves in the cross-hairs of the American Criminal Justice System.
Charles Edward Lincoln, III, Visiting Columnist with “Moffatt Media”
Short Article
(2022) State-by-State Federal Funds awarded in (2022) to States $75,000,000.00 (seventy-five-million dollars).
“Purpose and Use of Funds. The purpose of the narrative statement and corresponding budget is to provide U.S. citizens, Congress, the EAC and other election stakeholders with information about how your state will use these funds to improve the administration of elections for Federal office, including to enhance election technology and make election security improvements.” …”upgrade election-related computer systems to address cyber vulnerabilities identified through [Department of Homeland Security],” … says EAC.
To view the complete list of States that received (2022) Election Security Enhancement Funds, to prevent cyber vulnerabilities … click on the highlighted areas above for Source Links.
###
INTERVIEW BY MOFFATT MEDIA WITH MILITARY VETERAN
Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Updated 5/21/2022, Saturday
Interview by Moffatt Media, Voting Insights with Randy Hayes, U.S. Military Veteran, says Vote “NO” for Lisa McClain for (2022) Congress.
Veteran Hayes said he will also be encouraging other Military Veterans to Vote “NO,” for Lisa McClain, during her upcoming Congressional Reelection Campaign.
Moffatt Media: Randy, why are you voting “NO” for Lisa McClain Congressional Rep.?
Randy Hayes: I reached out to McClain’s Michigan and Washington DC Congressional Offices. Because I was asking for Veterans Assistance and was told that their offices weren’t able to help me even though I am a Military Veteran and live in her district.
I was only asking for Lisa McClain, Congressional Rep. to make a Congressional Inquiry to assist me with Visiting my Mother (Betty Hayes). Since the Michigan Wayne County Probate Court, is causing Age Discrimination against my Mother.
My Mother is a protected class member under the Older Americans Act. From what I have learned the Michigan Probate Court can’t discriminate against my Mother, who is age 87, while in receipt of Federal monies.
Now back to Congressional Rep. McClain, all I wanted from her was to assist me as a Veteran, but both her Michigan and Washington D.C. offices claimed they couldn’t help me!
It’s really sad when McClain Congressional Rep. was not even willing to make a telephone call on my behalf as a Military Veteran. Guess I was wrong to think that McClain Congressional Rep. provided Veteran Services.
I have no criminal record and I have never been arrested. Again, how hard would it be for Congressional Rep. McClain to even make a simple telephone call to the Court, regarding visitations with my mother?
Moffatt Media: Randy, what military branch did you serve in?
Randy Hayes: I served in the Marine Corps Reserve from 1982-1988 and I missed Desert Storm. From 1992-1995, I was in the Navy Seabees.
Moffatt Media: Randy why did you join the military?
Randy Hayes: I wanted to serve my country and be the best.
Moffatt Media: What age were you when you joined the Military?
Randy Hayes: 18
Moffatt Media: Randy you mentioned that you will be encouraging other Military Veterans to VOTE NO for Congressional Rep. McClain, what steps are you taking to spread the word, vote no on McClain?
Randy Hayes: I am a member of The American Legion, Post 351, Member of The Marine Corps League and I have over 2,000 friends on Facebook, who are mostly military veterans, that I will encourage them to VOTE NO for Ms. McClain.
Moffatt Media: Randy do you have any final words?
Randy Hayes: I have in the past supported Congressional Rep. McClain and listened to too many of her speeches. Now I will gladly go to Ms. McClain’s opponents to discuss how she has no regard for supporting Veterans. Because Ms. McClain has the power to assist me and my mother with a simple telephone call due to the outrageous actions by the Wayne County Probate Court.
It’s time to stand up for those that have lost their “Elder Rights” by the Michigan Wayne County Probate Court.
Congresswoman McClain’s office had no immediate comment.
###
A timeline of everything that’s happened from the premiere of the Framing Britney Spears documentary through the official termination of her conservatorship
UPDATE Nov. 12, 2021: After 14 years, Britney Spears’ conservatorship has been terminated.
The contentious fight over Britney Spears’ conservatorship entered a new phase after the singer’s scathing testimony in front of Los Angeles probate judge Brenda Penny in June, during which the pop star offered a harrowing account of the last 13 years of her life.
Since 2008, Spears’ life has been controlled by a conservatorship led by her once-estranged father, James “Jamie” Spears. The conservatorship has been credited by some with helping right Spears’ career after a tumultuous 2008 ended with a 5150 involuntary psychiatric hold; since then, Spears has put out hit albums, toured the world, and starred in a Las Vegas residency. But in her testimony, Spears claimed that her father and others enlisted to oversee her life and career have forced her to work ceaselessly; she even goes so far as to compare her seven-days-a-week, no-days-off schedule to sex trafficking. Spears, who also has a personal conservator, Jodi Montgomery, alleged that she was prescribed medication like lithium against her will and told she was not allowed to get married, have another child, or have her IUD removed.
