• Moffatt Media America's Taxpayer Watchdog News

Category: Articles

Dismantle the State Bar of Arizona – “Suspend” Supreme Court Rule 32

  By , ,

“Moffatt Media,” supports in part to Dismantle the State Bar of Arizona under Senate Bill 1435 (SB 1435).   “Moffatt Media,” also recommends that (SB 1435), be in Tribute to Lisa Aubuchon, Rachel Alexander & Andrew Thomas … because they have been constitutionally impacted by the Supreme Court of Arizona and private nonprofit corporation Arizona Bar.   

Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas were retaliated against for doing the right thing to investigate Maricopa County Arizona (Phoenix), $340 Mil (South Court Tower), Courthouse, that should have not escaped Voter Approval.  

“Moffatt Media,” supports (SB1435) in pertinent part at: Section 7, 12-119.06 “Attorney Licensing Requirements  … The supreme court may not require an attorney to be a member of any organization to become or remain a licensed attorney in this state.”  Bold for emphasis. 

Conflicts:  The Supreme Court mandates that attorneys become Members within the State Bar of Arizona, conflicts because:   (1) Arizona is a “Right to Work State.” See Arizona Constitution Article XXV (25) Section 0 and (2) In Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018), landmark case of the  United States Supreme Court, recognized mandatory union dues violated constitutional First Amendment right to free speech.   

Supreme Court Rule 32(1): “Practice of law. Every person licensed by this Court to engage in the practice of law must be a member of the State Bar of Arizona in accordance with these rules.”

Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1) mandatory membership is unconstitutional and illegal and must be Suspended inclusive in (SB 1435). 

Yet to this present date, the ​Supreme Court of Arizona continues to give in Don Bongino fashion, a “double barrel middle finger” towards the Arizona Legislatures, by refusing to reform, restore and implement First Amendment Protections.  

RECOMMENDATIONS 

Any continued refusal by the Supreme Court of Arizona,  NOT to reform, restore, implement and uphold State and Federal First Amendment constitutional laws, that apply to all people, including Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas and other Arizona Lawyers, then it’s time to call upon the Federal Government for intervention.  

Any continued refusal by the Supreme Court of Arizona,  NOT to Suspend Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1) Mandatory Membership, then legislatures must move for Articles of Impeachment against Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona for: public corruption, incompetency, neglect of duty while in their capacity as Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona.  Remember no one is above the law including Judges-Justices of the Arizona Supreme Court. 

Any continued failure to remove Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1), Mandatory Membership, in light of the Supreme Court case in  Janus v. AFSCME, is a “systemic structural implosion,” regulating attorneys. Continued failures by the Arizona Supreme Court not to uphold constitutional protections, the Federal Funds issued to the State of Arizona, should be Sanctioned for constitutional violations, along with disgorging Supreme Court Justices salaries.  

Since turning a blind eye to constitutional violations have adversely impacted ALL THREE: Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas … is illegal,  unconstitutional and needs immediate ratification into (SB 1435).  Extending legislative language into (SB 1435), would not be a difficult process to supplement.  

(SB 1435) should also be amended to state that Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas’ convictions were illegal, unconstitutional and subsequently null and void, under  Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1), mandatory membership.

Conclusive findings do exist with good cause to Reinstate All Three:  Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas …  it’s time! 

For all the foregoing reasons stated above “Moffatt Media,” supports (SB1435) in pertinent  part, that: “The supreme court may not require an attorney to be a member of any organization to become or remain a licensed attorney in this state.”  …

###

 

Arizona Supreme Court make your Wrong a Right

  By ,

Arizona Supreme Court: Your Wrong, time to make Right.  Remove the Excessive Sanction against Rachel Alexander, Lisa Aubuchon, Andrew Thomas and Reinstate their Arizona Attorneys license it’s time!

Findings reveal the Arizona Supreme Court has weaponized and imposed a $101,292.75 sanctioned against Rachel Alexander, Lisa Aubuchon and Andrew Thomas. The sanction was imposed under Supreme Court Rule 60(b).  

Moffatt Media urges reversal of the $101k+ sanction (fine), because it violates the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution related to “excessive fines,” among other issues.

Surprisingly the Supreme Court’s weaponization began by abusing its power with creating and also imposing administrative Supreme Court Rule 51, de facto law.  

Rule 51 intentionally created another Supreme Court Judge-Justice Seat in conflict with Arizona’s Constitution for Judicial Appointments.  Remember Courts don’t create laws, they interpret and decide laws!

More importantly, Supreme Court Rule 51,  has NEVER  been approved by ANY Arizona Governor, Arizona Legislators nor adopted into law.  Rule 51 continues to be weaponized against Alexander, Aubuchon, Thomas, Arizona Lawyers and other persons.

Essentially the Supreme Court of  Arizona has committed Prosecutorial Misconduct, by inducing Rule 51 weaponization schemes in the form of  “Canceling Out,” First Amendment Protections against All3: (Alexander, Aubuchon & Thomas).  …

Keeping in mind, no state including Arizona, can modify the Bill of Rights First Amendment Constitutional Protections without Two-Thirds Members of Congress or Two-Thirds Arizona Legislatures.  

But the Arizona Judiciary Legislatures did attempt to do the right thing and recommended that the A​rizona Supreme Court ​implement First Amendment Protections.   

However, the ​Supreme Court of Arizona continues to give a “double barrel middle finger” to the Arizona Judiciary Legislatures, by refusing to implement (restore)  First Amendment Protections. 

The failure by the Supreme Court of Arizona not to uphold and (restore) First Amendment Protections does in fact have a chilling adverse impact on Free Speech.

Consequently, maybe it’s time the Federal Government intervenes and impose Sanctions on the State of ​Arizona and ​the State Supreme Court of Arizona, for intentionally removing First Amendment Protections against All3: Alexander, Aubuchon & Thomas … 

“No matter what defense motions we submitted, no matter what evidence we submitted each and every single piece of defense evidence and discovery offered, were all “DENIED” by the Court.” ~ Rachel Alexander 

Moffatt Media’s Recommendation: 

The Supreme Court’s excessive Sanctions against Alexander Aubuchon Thomas masked as: Costs and Expenses should be removed, because they did the right thing to investigate Maricopa County Arizona (Phoenix), $340 Mil (South Court Tower), Courthouse, that should have not escaped Voter Approval. 

###

Reinstate ALL3​ Rachel Alexander, Lisa Aubuchon – Andrew Thomas

  By ,
​“David Stringer arrested in 1983 paying teens for sex.” …  says KTAR NEWS.
     Since Baltimore ​Child Pedophile (David Stringer) is able to  retain​​ his Arizona Lawyer’s license, surely there is no reason NOT to REINSTATE ALL3:  Rachel Alexander, Lisa  Aubuchon & Andrew Thomas​, just to name a few.
​

    Arizona remove the excessive cruel and unusual $101,000.00 illegal Sanction (Fine) imposed against All3 and REINSTATE All3: Rachel Alexander, Lisa Aubuchon and Andrew Thomas Lawyer’s License. Recommendation by Moffatt Media.

###

Prosecutor Switched Sides

  By , ,

A United States Department of Justice (DOJ) Prosecutor felt so guilty about how Defendant was treated, that the Prosecutor decided to switch sides, to represent Defendant instead of the Government

Have you ever heard of a Prosecutor switching sides to then defend an alleged Defendant just before Trial?

“Moffatt Media,” has expanded its investigative skills into an Innocence project case.

First time ever, for Moffatt Media’s Eyes to have Witnessed a Prosecutor switch sides to defend an alleged Defendant.

_____

In my 20 years as an attorney I have NEVER seen a situation where the Prosecutor (Plaintiff’s Attorney) for the United States of America government now becomes Defendants Counsel.

Defense counsel then becomes Plaintiff’s Counsel for the United States of America, said alleged Defendant.

“Since the Prosecutor is now my Counsel, can you have my new counsel call me?”

If my new attorney aka former Prosecutor does not proceed with a Motion to Dismiss the Indictment, will you put forth an effort for dismissal?”

The Transcript declares in part “True and Correct Transcript,” of the reported proceedings held, 9/1/2022.  Defendant argues it is impossible that the Transcript is: “True and Correct.” because the Prosecutor’s Appearance indicates to have switched sides.   The Prosecutor is now my defense counsel, says Defendant.

Above is not done in satire.   Moffatt Media’s eyes did witness where the Court Reporter flipped Prosecutor to represent Defendant, in a Transcript.

In a separate unrelated issue, an Amicus Brief filed by The Onion, actually made its way into the United States Supreme Court, was based on Satire.   Click on highlighted area above for Source Link.

The Onion’s Satire Amicus Brief, and errors found in an actual Federal U.S. District Court Central District Transcript covered by “Moffatt Media,” makes you see comedy at work in Federal criminal cases.

###

2022 Federal Funding issued to States for Election Securities Enhancements

  By ,

 

Short Article

(2022) State-by-State Federal Funds awarded in (2022) to States $75,000,000.00 (seventy-five-million dollars).

“Purpose and Use of Funds. The purpose of the narrative statement and corresponding budget is to provide U.S. citizens, Congress, the EAC and other election stakeholders with information about how your state will use these funds to improve the administration of elections for Federal office, including to enhance election technology and make election security improvements.” …”upgrade election-related computer systems to address cyber vulnerabilities identified through [Department of Homeland Security],” …  says EAC.

To view the complete list of States that received (2022) Election Security Enhancement Funds, to prevent cyber vulnerabilities … click on the highlighted areas above for Source Links.   

###

 

Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State Concealed 2020 Election Document

  By ,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

OPINION – “ARIZONA  ELECTION NEWS” 

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

By Star Moffatt, CEO and Gordon Wiborg, Chief of Police (Ret.) Captain, Armor, US Army (Ret.) – Disabled Veteran

Katie Hobbs, Arizona Secretary’s concealed document dated Jan 30 2020 AZ Funding Request Letter AND Received $8.3 Mil from Fed EAC-1 .  This document speaks for itself of (2020) Arizona Election Security Irregularities.

Did you know that in January 2020, just two months prior to the Arizona 2020 Primary Election, Hobbs requested $8.3 Million from the Federal government, for the benefit of 2020 Arizona “Election Securities?”

Hobbs herself could have prevented the massive physical election audits by disclosing, that she identified Election Security problems.   Because Hobbs requested $8.3 Million from the Federal government and specifically the Federal Funding agency: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, (EAC).

(2020) “Program Narrative by: Katie Hobbs Secretary of State – Grant Funding Information – Amount of Award $8,362,741;  Matching Funds Commitment $1,672,548 … Cyber Vulnerabilities.” …  HAVA to mean: “Help America Vote Act  (HAVA) of 2002 was passed by the United States Congress to make sweeping reforms to the nation’s voting process.” …

Hobbs also justified $8.3 Million for Voter Registration System Upgrades,” and “security fortification at state and local levels.” …

But Hobbs said that the actual physical audit was a “political stunt,” according to the Washington Examiner.

(2020) Public Election Deception schemes was Hobbs own concealment by requesting (2020) $8.3 Million from the Federal Government.

PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTION:

How many 2020 Arizona Voters have been disenfranchised because Hobbs concealed actual Election Security problems? 

Hobbs herself could have prevented the prior massive physical election audits by disclosing that she identified Election Security issues. See also FED FINANCIAL REPORT FROM 2018 THROUGH 2023 ON $7M

Contrary to her claims of transparency, now being revealed to the Arizonians and public, is Katie Hobbs, Secretary of State’s own January 30, 2020, election document, which she had intentionally concealed from the public.

Voting Security Election Irregularities, if didn’t exist within Arizona, then there would have NOT  been a need for Hobbs to request $8.3 Mil in (2020), from the Federal Government Election Assistance Commission!

 

###

United States Court Lynching Programs

  By ,

Sentencing News – (“Modern Day Court Lynching”)

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

Updated; 10/21/2022, Friday

In the United States they no longer do public  lynching by trees any more against my people,  other minorities and the poor.  

Photo – Jesse Washington 17 year old teen was lynched on May 15, 1916 and “[h]e was chained by his neck and dragged out of the county court by observers.”   Mob attackers against Washington,  “[h]e was then … stabbed and beaten, before being held down and castrated.  He was then lynched in front of Waco’s city hall.”

Fast forward with today’s American Criminal Justice system, consisting of camouflage alternative Barbarian Court Lynching  Programs.

The same court systems using outdated laws of 400 years plus to  mean America’s Federal Grand Jury proceedings.

Did you know there are only two countries that continue using Grand Jury proceedings?  The United States and Libya, are the only two countries still using  Federal Grand Jury Court Lynching Programs; and Defendants along with their defense counsel are  locked out of the Grand  Jury secret proceedings initiated  by Prosecutors. 

America’s Grand Jury proceedings are prejudicial from the onset, lack transparency and deprive constitutional equal protections, among other things.

The same  federal criminal justice court systems where laws are on the books, that do NOT make ANY common sense, but oppress.  Now I understand why my Papa and Mama loved Billie Holiday so much.

History shows that Ms. Holiday  became one of the “voices  for my people,” while citing protest lyrics  such as: (“Strange Fruit”) and her lyric words uttered were to expose truths about lynching history of Black Americans.

“Southern trees bear a strange fruit
Blood on the leaves and blood at the root
Black bodies swinging in the southern breeze
Strange fruit hanging from the poplar trees

Pastoral scene of the gallant south
The bulging eyes and the twisted mouth
Scent of magnolias, sweet and fresh
Then the sudden smell of burning flesh

Here is a fruit for the crows to pluck
For the rain to gather, for the wind to suck
For the sun to rot, for the trees to drop
Here is a strange and bitter crop.”  

Lynching in trees no longer, however, replaced with America’s Court Lynching Programs, that my own eyes are witnessing.    

As a consequence,  I must Rise Up and Speak Out, for the protection of  my own Black American Son, youths at risk, other minorities, disabled, the poor …  because NO ONE is safe anymore!   And “… until we value the lives, rights, and liberties of those on the receiving end of the system, “our justice system will continue to be anything but.” ~ Justice Sonia Sotomayor

“… Vital constitutional principle must not be forgotten: Liberty requires accountability.” ~ Justice Samuel Alito

“Noose Hanging” on our property during the 21st Century.

In Tribute to Jesse Washington, the late Ms. Billie Holiday, Carl Robinson & Hubby. 

_______

Public Comment by Cassie B –

“Billie Holiday’s song “Strange Fruit” has always sent chills down my spine​!​
 
It is so disheartening to see that horrific acts against humanity such as lynchings haven’t really gone away, they have simply morphed into a beast​,​ that remains hidden from the eyes of so many people​​​,​ until they find themselves or their loved ones caught inside the jaws of injustice.
 
In some ways it’s more sinister now because the strange fruit don’t hang in the breeze for all to see anymore and many of the people who try to speak truth to power are silenced or simply told they are crazy​,​ because there is this widely held belief that things have changed. But they really haven’t. They’ve just shifted.”

Jeff Fortenberry Community Service in Lieu of Prison? Due to Biden’s Failure

  By , , , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: YOUTUBE https://youtu.be/VHcIBNazStw

Sentencing News – Politics

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Fortenberry served as a Congressional Rep., from 2005-2022 (17 years) and resigned on March 26, 2022, after pressure by Kevin McCarthy, House Minority Leader.    

June 28, 2022 Fortenberry is to be sentenced.  Fortenberry’s sentence was prompted by a federal Jury that found Fortenberry guilty on March 25, 2022.

Along with a Grand Jury Indictment, filed against Fortenberry back on 10/19/2021, in the United States District Court Central District of California. JEFF FORTENBERRY NEBRASA CONGRESSMAN GJ JUNE 2021

But Fortenberry pleaded not guilty for supposedly giving False Statements to FBI agents (2016) on $30k Foreign Campaign Donation, at a California Fundraising Event. 

Fortenberry has served as a Nebraska Congressional Rep., who now finds himself facing “Excessive Sentencing,” for alleged nonviolent offense.

  • Public Interest Concern Question:  Why did Tracy Wilkison, Prosecutor-Acting United States Attorney,  NOT affix her own signature onto the Indictment, against Fortenberry

Because Wilkison was not officially appointed as a United States Attorney for the Central District until November 16, 2021, by Merrick Garland, United States Attorney General.  

  • Second Public Interest Concern Question:  Why is Fortenberry facing a statutory “Mandatory Maximum   Sentencing?”

Because President Biden has failed to restore the United States Sentencing Commission, since January 21, 2020.

Did you know, that both Congressional Representatives Armstrong and Raskin said the lack of quorum also meant the commission cannot update the advisory sentencing guidelines needed to help implement the law, resulting potentially in its uneven application by judges across the country.  

Sadly Biden’s intentional act not to appoint ANY commissioners on the Sentencing Commission, takes another toll on our American criminal justice system!

Installing a new Sentencing Commission would help prevent “Excessive Sentencing” to reform criminal Mandatory Maximum Sentencing, that contribute towards: “Massive Incarceration,” even against alleged nonviolent offenders including Fortenberry.

Since Biden’s failure to restore the Sentencing Commission, Fortenberry’s Sentence should be put on STAY.

In consequence, Fortenberry’s landmark case is an example to now call on Congress with evaluating and reforming 18 U.S. Code §1001, that imposes a Mandatory Maximum Sentencing 5 years.  In Fortenberry case (5 years x 3 counts)=15 year sentence Fortenberry is facing in prison.

Noting, without restoring the United States Sentencing Commission, confidence in the uniformity and fairness of our criminal justice system is gone!

With a broken criminal justice system American Citizens like Fortenberry are now becoming the target of  false criminal charges conjured by American rogue prosecutors.   

Fortberry, will be sentenced on three felony charges, that carries Maximum 15 years in prison, which is an “Excessive Sentence,” even if Fortenberry were to serve one day in Prison away from his family. 

Now as a Congressman who understands the absolute abuse of power brought by a select few corrupt individuals within the Justice Dept … my heart goes out to Congressman Fortenberry and his family for the injustice they have suffered,” said Rep. Rick Renzi

The Judge in Fortenberry’s case can do the right thing by issuing Court Ordered Community Service to Fortenberry with preventing another “Excessive Sentencing,” scheme.

Congress, it is time to bring more attention to “Mandatory Maximum Sentencing,” laws!  Because these same laws cause cruel punishment and “Excessive Sentencing,” where logic does not hold especially towards nonviolent offenders. 

Thus, a 15 year “Mandatory Maximum Sentence” against Fortenberry would be an “Excessive Sentence.”

Kevin McCarthy Congressman had no immediate response.

###

Military Veteran No Vote for Lisa McClain Congressional Representative

  By , , , , , , , , , ,

INTERVIEW BY MOFFATT MEDIA WITH MILITARY VETERAN

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


Updated 5/21/2022, Saturday

Interview by Moffatt Media, Voting Insights with Randy Hayes, U.S. Military Veteran, says Vote “NO” for Lisa McClain for (2022) Congress.

Veteran Hayes said he will also be encouraging other Military Veterans to Vote “NO,” for Lisa McClain, during her upcoming  Congressional Reelection Campaign.

Moffatt Media: Randy, why are you voting “NO” for Lisa McClain Congressional Rep.?
Randy Hayes: I reached out to McClain’s Michigan and Washington DC Congressional Offices.   Because I was asking for Veterans Assistance and  was told that their offices weren’t able to help me even though I am a Military Veteran and live in her district.

I was only asking for Lisa McClain, Congressional Rep. to make a Congressional Inquiry to assist me with Visiting my Mother (Betty Hayes).  Since the Michigan Wayne County Probate Court, is causing Age Discrimination against my Mother.

My Mother is a protected class member under the Older Americans Act.  From what I have learned the Michigan Probate Court can’t discriminate against my Mother, who is age 87, while in receipt of Federal monies. 

Now back to Congressional Rep. McClain, all I wanted from her was to assist me as a Veteran, but both her Michigan and Washington D.C. offices claimed they couldn’t help me!

It’s really sad when McClain Congressional Rep. was not even willing to make a telephone call on my behalf as a Military Veteran.   Guess I was wrong to think that McClain Congressional Rep. provided Veteran Services.

I have no criminal record and I have never been arrested.    Again, how hard would it be for Congressional Rep. McClain to even make a simple telephone call to the Court, regarding visitations with my mother?
 
Moffatt Media: Randy, what military branch did you serve in?
Randy Hayes: I served in the Marine Corps Reserve from 1982-1988 and I missed Desert Storm.  From 1992-1995, I was in the Navy Seabees.

Moffatt Media: Randy why did you join the military?
Randy Hayes: I wanted to serve my country and be the best.

Moffatt Media: What age were you when you joined the Military?
Randy Hayes: 18

Moffatt Media: Randy you mentioned that you will be encouraging other Military Veterans to VOTE NO for Congressional Rep. McClain, what steps are you taking to spread the word, vote no on McClain?
Randy Hayes: I am a member of The American Legion, Post 351, Member of The Marine Corps League and I have over 2,000 friends on Facebook, who are mostly military veterans, that I will encourage them to VOTE NO for Ms. McClain.

Moffatt Media: Randy do you have any final words?
Randy Hayes: I have in the past supported Congressional Rep. McClain and  listened to too many of her speeches. Now I will gladly go to Ms. McClain’s opponents to discuss how she has no regard for supporting Veterans.  Because  Ms. McClain has the power to assist me and my mother with a simple telephone call due to the outrageous actions by the Wayne County Probate Court.

It’s time to stand up for those that have lost their “Elder Rights” by the Michigan Wayne County Probate Court.

Congresswoman McClain’s office had no immediate comment.

###

Beware Report 4 Women Beware of Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson

  By , ,

Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearings 1st Black female Supreme Court pick faces senators

I lost all respect for YOU Sup Ct Justice Nominee Jackson, from the point you can’t define the word “Woman.”

Yes, I said YOUR name above because “there is a special place in hell for Women who don’t Support other Women.” Quote by Madeline Albright