• Moffatt Media America's Taxpayer Watchdog News

Category: State

Disbar Alvin Bragg New York District Attorney Prosecutor for Targeting Former President

  By , , ,

Alvin Bragg Jr., District Attorney (Prosecutor), on the job one-year, targets Former President Donald Trump, is so un-American.  Should Bragg  be DISBARRED? 

One has to ask, why would anyone allow Rookie Bragg to pursue former President Trump?  Because he (Bragg) is indispensable and other smart tenured staff in the Manhattan DA’s Office do not wish to jeopardize their own Retirement Plans and livelihoods. 

But did you know that between 2018 & 2020 the Federal government under the Trump administration fed the State of New York with $41.4 Million?  

 And did you know that the Federal government then fed the State of New York with another $3.2 Million in the year 2022?   

The Federal government fed the State of New York, multiple millions of dollars ($45 Mil) in years 2018-2022 for Voting Cyber Security enhancements and “Remediation.”  Does the State of New York not realize the saying:  “Never bite the hand that feeds you.” 

PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTION

Is the State of New York suffering from memory lapse, that from 2018 through 2020 Former President Trump and his Administration, has fed New York with multiple millions of dollars for Voting Cyber Security enhancements (improvements)?  

Public Interest Parting Question: Should the Federal government request a refund of the ($45 Mil), Sanction and investigate Voting Irregularities, in the 2021 Manhattan District Attorney General Election?  

Bragg won his DA (Prosecutor) seat on November 2 2021 at: 83.2% and took office January 1, 2022.  During the General Election, one opponent only garnered 16.7%.   Something seems suspicious with this District Attorney Election on its surface. 

Maybe The Project 65 should look at filing a lawyer licensing complaint against Bragg, to have him DISBARRED, for maybe exceeding his scope of employment, job duties and job functions by targeting Former President Trump, on a subject matter of 2016, past the statute of limitations. 

Shameful justice State of New York, in condoning  Alvin Bragg’s illegal targeting Former President Trump.   The same man, former President Trump and his administration, who has helped feed your state.   

“Moffatt Media,” waits for the unsealed purported Indictment against former President Trump! 

###

Dismantle the State Bar of Arizona – “Suspend” Supreme Court Rule 32

  By , ,

“Moffatt Media,” supports in part to Dismantle the State Bar of Arizona under Senate Bill 1435 (SB 1435).   “Moffatt Media,” also recommends that (SB 1435), be in Tribute to Lisa Aubuchon, Rachel Alexander & Andrew Thomas … because they have been constitutionally impacted by the Supreme Court of Arizona and private nonprofit corporation Arizona Bar.   

Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas were retaliated against for doing the right thing to investigate Maricopa County Arizona (Phoenix), $340 Mil (South Court Tower), Courthouse, that should have not escaped Voter Approval.  

“Moffatt Media,” supports (SB1435) in pertinent part at: Section 7, 12-119.06 “Attorney Licensing Requirements  … The supreme court may not require an attorney to be a member of any organization to become or remain a licensed attorney in this state.”  Bold for emphasis. 

Conflicts:  The Supreme Court mandates that attorneys become Members within the State Bar of Arizona, conflicts because:   (1) Arizona is a “Right to Work State.” See Arizona Constitution Article XXV (25) Section 0 and (2) In Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018), landmark case of the  United States Supreme Court, recognized mandatory union dues violated constitutional First Amendment right to free speech.   

Supreme Court Rule 32(1): “Practice of law. Every person licensed by this Court to engage in the practice of law must be a member of the State Bar of Arizona in accordance with these rules.”

Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1) mandatory membership is unconstitutional and illegal and must be Suspended inclusive in (SB 1435). 

Yet to this present date, the ​Supreme Court of Arizona continues to give in Don Bongino fashion, a “double barrel middle finger” towards the Arizona Legislatures, by refusing to reform, restore and implement First Amendment Protections.  

RECOMMENDATIONS 

Any continued refusal by the Supreme Court of Arizona,  NOT to reform, restore, implement and uphold State and Federal First Amendment constitutional laws, that apply to all people, including Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas and other Arizona Lawyers, then it’s time to call upon the Federal Government for intervention.  

Any continued refusal by the Supreme Court of Arizona,  NOT to Suspend Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1) Mandatory Membership, then legislatures must move for Articles of Impeachment against Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona for: public corruption, incompetency, neglect of duty while in their capacity as Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona.  Remember no one is above the law including Judges-Justices of the Arizona Supreme Court. 

Any continued failure to remove Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1), Mandatory Membership, in light of the Supreme Court case in  Janus v. AFSCME, is a “systemic structural implosion,” regulating attorneys. Continued failures by the Arizona Supreme Court not to uphold constitutional protections, the Federal Funds issued to the State of Arizona, should be Sanctioned for constitutional violations, along with disgorging Supreme Court Justices salaries.  

Since turning a blind eye to constitutional violations have adversely impacted ALL THREE: Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas … is illegal,  unconstitutional and needs immediate ratification into (SB 1435).  Extending legislative language into (SB 1435), would not be a difficult process to supplement.  

(SB 1435) should also be amended to state that Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas’ convictions were illegal, unconstitutional and subsequently null and void, under  Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1), mandatory membership.

Conclusive findings do exist with good cause to Reinstate All Three:  Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas …  it’s time! 

For all the foregoing reasons stated above “Moffatt Media,” supports (SB1435) in pertinent  part, that: “The supreme court may not require an attorney to be a member of any organization to become or remain a licensed attorney in this state.”  …

###

 

Reinstate ALL3​ Rachel Alexander, Lisa Aubuchon – Andrew Thomas

  By ,
​“David Stringer arrested in 1983 paying teens for sex.” …  says KTAR NEWS.
     Since Baltimore ​Child Pedophile (David Stringer) is able to  retain​​ his Arizona Lawyer’s license, surely there is no reason NOT to REINSTATE ALL3:  Rachel Alexander, Lisa  Aubuchon & Andrew Thomas​, just to name a few.
​

    Arizona remove the excessive cruel and unusual $101,000.00 illegal Sanction (Fine) imposed against All3 and REINSTATE All3: Rachel Alexander, Lisa Aubuchon and Andrew Thomas Lawyer’s License. Recommendation by Moffatt Media.

###

Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State Concealed 2020 Election Document

  By ,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

OPINION – “ARIZONA  ELECTION NEWS” 

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

By Star Moffatt, CEO and Gordon Wiborg, Chief of Police (Ret.) Captain, Armor, US Army (Ret.) – Disabled Veteran

Katie Hobbs, Arizona Secretary’s concealed document dated Jan 30 2020 AZ Funding Request Letter AND Received $8.3 Mil from Fed EAC-1 .  This document speaks for itself of (2020) Arizona Election Security Irregularities.

Did you know that in January 2020, just two months prior to the Arizona 2020 Primary Election, Hobbs requested $8.3 Million from the Federal government, for the benefit of 2020 Arizona “Election Securities?”

Hobbs herself could have prevented the massive physical election audits by disclosing, that she identified Election Security problems.   Because Hobbs requested $8.3 Million from the Federal government and specifically the Federal Funding agency: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, (EAC).

(2020) “Program Narrative by: Katie Hobbs Secretary of State – Grant Funding Information – Amount of Award $8,362,741;  Matching Funds Commitment $1,672,548 … Cyber Vulnerabilities.” …  HAVA to mean: “Help America Vote Act  (HAVA) of 2002 was passed by the United States Congress to make sweeping reforms to the nation’s voting process.” …

Hobbs also justified $8.3 Million for Voter Registration System Upgrades,” and “security fortification at state and local levels.” …

But Hobbs said that the actual physical audit was a “political stunt,” according to the Washington Examiner.

(2020) Public Election Deception schemes was Hobbs own concealment by requesting (2020) $8.3 Million from the Federal Government.

PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTION:

How many 2020 Arizona Voters have been disenfranchised because Hobbs concealed actual Election Security problems? 

Hobbs herself could have prevented the prior massive physical election audits by disclosing that she identified Election Security issues. See also FED FINANCIAL REPORT FROM 2018 THROUGH 2023 ON $7M

Contrary to her claims of transparency, now being revealed to the Arizonians and public, is Katie Hobbs, Secretary of State’s own January 30, 2020, election document, which she had intentionally concealed from the public.

Voting Security Election Irregularities, if didn’t exist within Arizona, then there would have NOT  been a need for Hobbs to request $8.3 Mil in (2020), from the Federal Government Election Assistance Commission!

 

###

Jeff Fortenberry’s Criminal Conviction scheduled to be overturned by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals California

  By ,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(“Prosecutor News”)

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

Indictment was filed on October 19, 2021, against Fortenberry, Former Nebraska Congressman.  The Indictment filed by Tracy Wilkison, United States Acting Attorney General (“Prosecutor”), was invalid.  Because Wilkison’s  TERM EXPIRED, under the Vacancy Reform Act of 1998.

There also existed an impossibility in Wilkison filling the shoes within the United States Attorney General’s position because she had NOT received a Presidential Nomination from President Biden,  pursuant to 5 U.S. Code §3345.   Wilkison was also not Senate confirmed.

Wilkison did NOT even receive ANY Nomination by Donald Trump, Former President to fulfill the United States Attorney General shoes for Central District.

Recent 10 28 2022 9TH CIR CT APPEAL FILED BY FORTENBERRY  within the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, is likely to be granted for improper Venue and problems with Jury Instructions.    

Along with granting Fortenberry’s appeal following an “unprecedented prosecution in which the Department of Justice hauled a sitting member of Congress across the country to stand trial in a foreign jurisdiction on charges of making false statements more than a thousand miles away.”

The appeal cites two key reasons for the conviction to be overturned: improper venue for the case, with the allegedly false statements being made in Nebraska and Washington, D.C.,  Charges filed in California and inadequate jury instructions that failed to appropriately define a key element of the charge; and the materiality of Fortenberry’s statements.

The case against  Fortenberry never should have been brought in the first place.   Criminal charges should have not resulted in California or a conviction, said Glen Summers.   Summers, a leading member of Fortenberry’s legal team and partner with Bartlit Beck LLP.  “This appeal calls on the Ninth Circuit to vacate these convictions to protect Fortenberry and other Americans from having their Constitutional rights trampled.”

FBI agents knew Jeff Fortenberry had no knowledge of illegal contributions to his campaign from a 2016 fundraiser. So, they directed an informant to call him years later and make a few comments in a roughly 10-minute phone call suggesting that people might have made improper contributions at the event.

Nine months later, the very same FBI agent who orchestrated the setup call went to the Congressman’s home in Nebraska and used a “ruse” that he was conducting a background check with a national security aspect to convince the Congressman to speak with him.

Even though the Congressman told the FBI agent about the comments from the informant, both at the first conversation and again in a subsequent interview in Washington, D.C., prosecutors indicted the Congressman for allegedly making false statements to them when he failed to recall some details of the nearly year-old conversation and explained that he was not “aware” of any illegal contributions to his campaign.

Prosecutors with the Department of Justice (DOJ) charged Congressman Fortenberry in Los Angeles. 

(DOJ) Prosecutors required Fortenerry to stand trial in Los Angeles, California Central District United States Federal Court.  Even though the alleged false statements were made at interviews conducted in Lincoln, Nebraska, and Washington, D.C.  Fortenberry asserts on appeal that subjecting him to prosecution in Los Angeles was contrary to law.  Subjecting Fortenberry within the wrong Venue (Jurisdiction) and requires that the conviction be set aside.

In Fortenberry’s appeal brief, the conviction should also be set aside.  Because the trial judge gave the jury instructions that inadequately defined critical elements of materiality.  Lacking elements then allowed the jury to convict Fortenberry.   Even though the alleged false statements could not possibly have had any impact or injury on the government.

For a statement to be material, eligible for a false statements charge,  such law requires it to influence governmental decision.

Fortenberry’s statements were not material to the government’s investigation.  Since prosecutors already knew from their own investigation, that Fortenberry had no knowledge of the illegal contributions to his campaign.

Jury Instructions Why Important “Voice Removed” Lawyer Connie Reguli, Listen

###

 

Sentencing Reforms by Locked In & Moffatt Media – 105 Year Sentence Inhumane

  By ,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Sentencing News

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

Updated 10/21/2022:   Listen –

Locked In & Moffatt Media are proud to announce a Coalition Sentencing Reform project:  “STOP EXCESSIVE SENTENCING.”  

Amid Sentencing Reforms towards Youth/Adults at Post Convictions and Pretrial.

HOW:  “We start one inmate at a time,” says Locked In & Moffatt Media.

WHY:   Because “Excessive Sentencing,” does not make ANY 21st Century common sense.

Behind Justice Example #1

Carl Robinson, an inmate within California State Prison (CFT), was sentenced to 105 years in Prison.

Locked In and Moffatt Media, mutually agree that our current American Criminal Justice system,  induces  Human Rights Violation in the form of  Genocide.

By targeting, a certain race of people being minorities, disabled and the poor.   The specific targeting causes “EXCESSIVE SENTENCING.” 

Logic does not hold that Robinson a Black American Male inmate at (CTF) Prison, will NOT live out a 105 year sentence.   Because according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) Mortality Tables,  males within the United States Total Life Expectancy:  age 74.2. 

Source:  https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-visualization/state-life-expectancy/index_2020.htm

 Public Interest Concern Question –

  • Why does the United States Criminal Justice System and California sentence people like Robinson, past his determined (CDC) Life Expectancy?

Now Locked In & Moffatt Media’s, “Call to Action” invites you, your loved ones and friends to join hands with us for true Sentencing Reforms that make common sense.   

“STOP EXCESSIVE SENTENCING,” past one’s Life Expectancy.

Also reduce Fiscal Impact of direct, current, medical and public costs associated with housing Robinson and other inmates throughout the United States past their  Life Expectancy.

Locked In and Moffatt Media … do NOT expect the United States Criminal Justice System to continue imposing inhumane Third World Justice, that erodes public confidence.  

“Press Release Tribute” to my surviving father on this  day of his Birthday 10/10/2022.  ~ Star Moffatt CEO/Founder of Moffatt Media.

Judicial Imposter – $20 million claim filed against Arizona’s “Judicial Imposter” for failure to uphold “First Amendment Protections” …

  By ,

Jeffrey Moffatt seeks $20 million against Arizona, the State Supreme Court of Arizona and State Bar of Arizona, according to a copy of the filed document: 9 13 2022 NOTICE OF CLAIM TORT AGAINST AZ et al served on Brnovich  To view document click on purple highlighted area.

Moffatt served his claim against Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General and Risk Management, on September 16, 2022, Friday.

First Amendment Protection violations imposed by Arizona’s Supreme Court “Judicial Imposter” William J. O’Neil, seated on the Supreme Court bench from 2010-2021.

Specifically, the claim is the first step toward a potential lawsuit against the State of Arizona.   If a settlement cannot be reached or Arizona denies the claim, Moffatt’s next step is to file a lawsuit against Arizona for failure to uphold First Amendment Protections, among other issues.

“Arizona’s Third World Justice,” amounts to intentionally turning blind eyes filled with brazen Public Corruption Schemes.

Sunday’s Arizona Lawyers Did You Know?

  By ,

Real Talk-Real Fact News –

Sunday’s Inside Scoop for “Arizona Lawyers:”  Did you know a fraction of your annual Bar Dues have been transferred to Catholic Charities?

The fraction of your annual attorney Bar Dues, have been transferred by a non-governmental organization (NGO), Non-Profit Corporation 501(c)(3), named State Bar of Arizona.

Remembering Thousands of Arizona Lawyers who died on the Inside

  By ,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Societal-Legal News

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

True, twenty-one years ago today several Americans died in the September 11, 2001 attacks.   The terrorist incident against our country and fellow Americans was beyond horrific, that none will ever forget and will forever be a stain that took place on American soil.

Regardless, on today, 9/11/2022, we need to also remember our fellow Americans defined as Arizona Lawyers who have died on the inside mentally and physically, because they have suffered induced discrimination with losing their fundamentally guaranteed constitutional rights and constitutional protections at the hand of domestic terrorism.

Multiple thousands of Arizona Lawyers have been reduced to financial ruins, families destroyed, suffered homelessness, and have become unemployable. WHY?

Because Arizona Lawyers have less rights than ANY other person within the United States of America and even on this sacred day 9/11.  They have suffered bold and unrelenting unconstitutional tactics.

Continued Public Interest Concern Questions:

(1).  Did you know Arizona Lawyers do not have equal access to justice with being afforded a Jury Trial before their own Peers?

(2).  Did you know if an Arizona Lawyer is being claimed to have committed criminal conduct, the Arizona Lawyer is NOT afforded the right to be assisted by a Court Appointed Counsel?

(3).  Did you know Arizona Lawyers who are prosecuted under Rule 8.4(b) or any other Rules they NEVER receive a Speedy Trial, within 70 days of being criminally charged? 

(4).  Did you know Arizona Lawyers are only allowed to go before a “Hearing Panel,” when claimed to have criminal or unethical conduct?  The same three person “Hearing Panel,” that has NEVER been approved by ANY Arizona Governor or Arizona House of Representatives.

(5).  Furthermore, did you know, Arizona Lawyers are denied equal protections, because they do not have ANY ability to raise constitutional challenges even to defend themselves?

Noting,  it is an Atrocity and Human Rights Violations, that Arizona has permitted and condoned the cover-ups under Rule 51,  with murder weapons to proceed in fatally “killing” thousands of Arizona Lawyers jobs, legal careers and their small owned legal businesses, while denying Arizona Lawyers their Constitutional Rights and fundamentally guaranteed “First Amendment Protections,” even as American Citizen’s!

In consequence, the purported Supreme Court Judge (“Judicial False Impersonator”) William J. O’Neil, Presiding Disciplinary Judge, from 2010-2021, has even bragged publicly, when Arizona Lawyer’s come before him to prosecute, that he does not use civil or criminal proceedings, he prosecutes Arizona Lawyers only using Sui Generis.   https://youtu.be/yBKqG1u0IDY

Hence America is a great country, and it does many things well.   However, within the State of Arizona, a vast blind spot exists, in facilitating an ability for Arizona people and specifically Arizona Lawyers who face alleged criminal conduct and ethical charges, said proceedings are being done above law as:  “Sui Generis.” Third World Justice!

Yes today on 9/11 we must remember our fellow Americans who suffered at the hands of Foreign Terrorists.  But this day is also in Tribute to fallen “American Arizona Lawyers,” within Arizona, where there exists Domestic Terrorists, who are NOT upholding constitutional Oath promises, to defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic.  

In Arizona’s “Third World Justice” YOU can have any Decision YOU want, against ANY Arizona Lawyer YOU want, with the stroke of a keyboard and pen!

“Third World Justice in Arizona,” undermines equal access to justice within actual Courts of Record!

###

 

Jeff Fortenberry Community Service in Lieu of Prison? Due to Biden’s Failure

  By , , , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: YOUTUBE https://youtu.be/VHcIBNazStw

Sentencing News – Politics

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Fortenberry served as a Congressional Rep., from 2005-2022 (17 years) and resigned on March 26, 2022, after pressure by Kevin McCarthy, House Minority Leader.    

June 28, 2022 Fortenberry is to be sentenced.  Fortenberry’s sentence was prompted by a federal Jury that found Fortenberry guilty on March 25, 2022.

Along with a Grand Jury Indictment, filed against Fortenberry back on 10/19/2021, in the United States District Court Central District of California. JEFF FORTENBERRY NEBRASA CONGRESSMAN GJ JUNE 2021

But Fortenberry pleaded not guilty for supposedly giving False Statements to FBI agents (2016) on $30k Foreign Campaign Donation, at a California Fundraising Event. 

Fortenberry has served as a Nebraska Congressional Rep., who now finds himself facing “Excessive Sentencing,” for alleged nonviolent offense.

  • Public Interest Concern Question:  Why did Tracy Wilkison, Prosecutor-Acting United States Attorney,  NOT affix her own signature onto the Indictment, against Fortenberry

Because Wilkison was not officially appointed as a United States Attorney for the Central District until November 16, 2021, by Merrick Garland, United States Attorney General.  

  • Second Public Interest Concern Question:  Why is Fortenberry facing a statutory “Mandatory Maximum   Sentencing?”

Because President Biden has failed to restore the United States Sentencing Commission, since January 21, 2020.

Did you know, that both Congressional Representatives Armstrong and Raskin said the lack of quorum also meant the commission cannot update the advisory sentencing guidelines needed to help implement the law, resulting potentially in its uneven application by judges across the country.  

Sadly Biden’s intentional act not to appoint ANY commissioners on the Sentencing Commission, takes another toll on our American criminal justice system!

Installing a new Sentencing Commission would help prevent “Excessive Sentencing” to reform criminal Mandatory Maximum Sentencing, that contribute towards: “Massive Incarceration,” even against alleged nonviolent offenders including Fortenberry.

Since Biden’s failure to restore the Sentencing Commission, Fortenberry’s Sentence should be put on STAY.

In consequence, Fortenberry’s landmark case is an example to now call on Congress with evaluating and reforming 18 U.S. Code §1001, that imposes a Mandatory Maximum Sentencing 5 years.  In Fortenberry case (5 years x 3 counts)=15 year sentence Fortenberry is facing in prison.

Noting, without restoring the United States Sentencing Commission, confidence in the uniformity and fairness of our criminal justice system is gone!

With a broken criminal justice system American Citizens like Fortenberry are now becoming the target of  false criminal charges conjured by American rogue prosecutors.   

Fortberry, will be sentenced on three felony charges, that carries Maximum 15 years in prison, which is an “Excessive Sentence,” even if Fortenberry were to serve one day in Prison away from his family. 

Now as a Congressman who understands the absolute abuse of power brought by a select few corrupt individuals within the Justice Dept … my heart goes out to Congressman Fortenberry and his family for the injustice they have suffered,” said Rep. Rick Renzi

The Judge in Fortenberry’s case can do the right thing by issuing Court Ordered Community Service to Fortenberry with preventing another “Excessive Sentencing,” scheme.

Congress, it is time to bring more attention to “Mandatory Maximum Sentencing,” laws!  Because these same laws cause cruel punishment and “Excessive Sentencing,” where logic does not hold especially towards nonviolent offenders. 

Thus, a 15 year “Mandatory Maximum Sentence” against Fortenberry would be an “Excessive Sentence.”

Kevin McCarthy Congressman had no immediate response.

###