Public Interest Concern: PUBLIC CORPORATION having a corporate name: The State Bar of California (SBC) has illegally investigated, charged and prosecuted Trump Adviser John Eastman. (SBC) proceedings against Eastman have been done before an unconstitutional illegal Court.
Eastman has been Illegally investigated, charged (administratively) and prosecuted by “CORPORATION,” State Bar of California, which is a non-governmental organization (NGO) “Public Corporation?”
The proceedings before (SBC) are illegal and administrative proceedings only against Eastman, because (SBC) is NOT a real court of law. The administrative proceedings are done by (SBC), which does NOT have to uphold State or Federal Constitutional laws that protect Eastman and other California Lawyer’s.
The California Constitution admits that the State Bar of California is only a public corporation. See California Constitution Article 6 Section 9, which reads in pertinent part: “[t]he State Bar of California is a Public Corporation.” …
Do you know the State Bar of California has NOT been delegated STATE POLICE PROSECUTORIAL POWERS? Only the County District Attorney’s Office usually conducts investigations to criminally charge people. Not a “Public Corporation.”
“This Court has held that delegations of regulatory power to private parties are impermissible, Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U. S. 238, 311 (1936), it held the delegation to be unconstitutional, 721 F. 3d, at 677.”
There have NOT been ANY amendments to the California Constitution to allow the public corporation State Bar of California (SBC) to receive prosecutorial or court powers to be recognized as an official “Court of Record,” or a prosecutorial agency similar to a District Attorney’s Office.
Shame on the State Supreme Court of California for going rogue in delegating your court powers to CORPORATION: The State Bar of California (SBC) .
It’s time to take back your wrongfully delegated regulatory powers to CORPORATION (SBC) and retain both jurisdiction and regulatory powers over California Lawyer’s. Failure by the State Supreme Court of California to take back wrongfully delegating powers outside of the California Constitution will continue to cause imminent public safety dangers to both consumers and California Lawyer’s.
PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTION
WHETHER the State Bar of California, has committed Prosecutorial Misconduct, against Eastman?
California Bar you’re now exposed and no longer permitted to conceal from the public your legendary myth inferring to be a licensing body when in fact only a mere “Public Corporation.”
The State Supreme Court of California nor the State of California can delegate prosecutorial or judicial powers to ANY “Public Corporation,” because “judicial power of this State is vested in the Supreme Court, courts of appeal, and superior courts, all of which are courts of record.”
“[t]his Court has held that delegations of regulatory power to private parties are impermissible, Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U. S. 238, 311 (1936), it held the delegation to be unconstitutional, 721 F. 3d, at 677. See Department of Transportation v Association of American Railroads 575 U.S 43 2015 Amtrak
Thus, an abhorrent appearance of “Conflict of Interest” exists between the State Supreme Court of California and the State Bar of California. The “Conflict of Interest” is problematic because it violates Constitutional Separation of Powers.
A conflict of interest scheme causes the Supreme Court to run afoul of the Separation of Powers, with (NGO), Public Corporation State Bar of California against Eastman.
Eastman’s own attorneys will NOT challenge the abhorrent constitutional conflict of interest in violation with Separation of Powers, between the Supreme Court and State Bar of California, are they too will find themselves DISBARRED!
To this end, the State Supreme Court of California, was the only licensing government body that issued Eastman lawyer’s license to practice law and hang his lawyer’s license on his wall of fame for public viewing.
The power of history is in telling the truth: California 2020 admits spent $134mil Voting Machines outdated beyond repair.
Note areas highlighted in “purple” click on to read: supportive documents or sources of references.