• Moffatt Media America's Taxpayer Watchdog News

Category: Press Release

Sentencing Reforms by Locked In & Moffatt Media – 105 Year Sentence Inhumane

  By ,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Sentencing News

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

Updated 10/21/2022:   Listen –

Locked In & Moffatt Media are proud to announce a Coalition Sentencing Reform project:  “STOP EXCESSIVE SENTENCING.”  

Amid Sentencing Reforms towards Youth/Adults at Post Convictions and Pretrial.

HOW:  “We start one inmate at a time,” says Locked In & Moffatt Media.

WHY:   Because “Excessive Sentencing,” does not make ANY 21st Century common sense.

Behind Justice Example #1

Carl Robinson, an inmate within California State Prison (CFT), was sentenced to 105 years in Prison.

Locked In and Moffatt Media, mutually agree that our current American Criminal Justice system,  induces  Human Rights Violation in the form of  Genocide.

By targeting, a certain race of people being minorities, disabled and the poor.   The specific targeting causes “EXCESSIVE SENTENCING.” 

Logic does not hold that Robinson a Black American Male inmate at (CTF) Prison, will NOT live out a 105 year sentence.   Because according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) Mortality Tables,  males within the United States Total Life Expectancy:  age 74.2. 

Source:  https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-visualization/state-life-expectancy/index_2020.htm

 Public Interest Concern Question –

  • Why does the United States Criminal Justice System and California sentence people like Robinson, past his determined (CDC) Life Expectancy?

Now Locked In & Moffatt Media’s, “Call to Action” invites you, your loved ones and friends to join hands with us for true Sentencing Reforms that make common sense.   

“STOP EXCESSIVE SENTENCING,” past one’s Life Expectancy.

Also reduce Fiscal Impact of direct, current, medical and public costs associated with housing Robinson and other inmates throughout the United States past their  Life Expectancy.

Locked In and Moffatt Media … do NOT expect the United States Criminal Justice System to continue imposing inhumane Third World Justice, that erodes public confidence.  

“Press Release Tribute” to my surviving father on this  day of his Birthday 10/10/2022.  ~ Star Moffatt CEO/Founder of Moffatt Media.

Judicial Imposter – $20 million claim filed against Arizona’s “Judicial Imposter” for failure to uphold “First Amendment Protections” …

  By ,

Jeffrey Moffatt seeks $20 million against Arizona, the State Supreme Court of Arizona and State Bar of Arizona, according to a copy of the filed document: 9 13 2022 NOTICE OF CLAIM TORT AGAINST AZ et al served on Brnovich  To view document click on purple highlighted area.

Moffatt served his claim against Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General and Risk Management, on September 16, 2022, Friday.

First Amendment Protection violations imposed by Arizona’s Supreme Court “Judicial Imposter” William J. O’Neil, seated on the Supreme Court bench from 2010-2021.

Specifically, the claim is the first step toward a potential lawsuit against the State of Arizona.   If a settlement cannot be reached or Arizona denies the claim, Moffatt’s next step is to file a lawsuit against Arizona for failure to uphold First Amendment Protections, among other issues.

“Arizona’s Third World Justice,” amounts to intentionally turning blind eyes filled with brazen Public Corruption Schemes.

Remembering Thousands of Arizona Lawyers who died on the Inside

  By ,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Societal-Legal News

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

True, twenty-one years ago today several Americans died in the September 11, 2001 attacks.   The terrorist incident against our country and fellow Americans was beyond horrific, that none will ever forget and will forever be a stain that took place on American soil.

Regardless, on today, 9/11/2022, we need to also remember our fellow Americans defined as Arizona Lawyers who have died on the inside mentally and physically, because they have suffered induced discrimination with losing their fundamentally guaranteed constitutional rights and constitutional protections at the hand of domestic terrorism.

Multiple thousands of Arizona Lawyers have been reduced to financial ruins, families destroyed, suffered homelessness, and have become unemployable. WHY?

Because Arizona Lawyers have less rights than ANY other person within the United States of America and even on this sacred day 9/11.  They have suffered bold and unrelenting unconstitutional tactics.

Continued Public Interest Concern Questions:

(1).  Did you know Arizona Lawyers do not have equal access to justice with being afforded a Jury Trial before their own Peers?

(2).  Did you know if an Arizona Lawyer is being claimed to have committed criminal conduct, the Arizona Lawyer is NOT afforded the right to be assisted by a Court Appointed Counsel?

(3).  Did you know Arizona Lawyers who are prosecuted under Rule 8.4(b) or any other Rules they NEVER receive a Speedy Trial, within 70 days of being criminally charged? 

(4).  Did you know Arizona Lawyers are only allowed to go before a “Hearing Panel,” when claimed to have criminal or unethical conduct?  The same three person “Hearing Panel,” that has NEVER been approved by ANY Arizona Governor or Arizona House of Representatives.

(5).  Furthermore, did you know, Arizona Lawyers are denied equal protections, because they do not have ANY ability to raise constitutional challenges even to defend themselves?

Noting,  it is an Atrocity and Human Rights Violations, that Arizona has permitted and condoned the cover-ups under Rule 51,  with murder weapons to proceed in fatally “killing” thousands of Arizona Lawyers jobs, legal careers and their small owned legal businesses, while denying Arizona Lawyers their Constitutional Rights and fundamentally guaranteed “First Amendment Protections,” even as American Citizen’s!

In consequence, the purported Supreme Court Judge (“Judicial False Impersonator”) William J. O’Neil, Presiding Disciplinary Judge, from 2010-2021, has even bragged publicly, when Arizona Lawyer’s come before him to prosecute, that he does not use civil or criminal proceedings, he prosecutes Arizona Lawyers only using Sui Generis.   https://youtu.be/yBKqG1u0IDY

Hence America is a great country, and it does many things well.   However, within the State of Arizona, a vast blind spot exists, in facilitating an ability for Arizona people and specifically Arizona Lawyers who face alleged criminal conduct and ethical charges, said proceedings are being done above law as:  “Sui Generis.” Third World Justice!

Yes today on 9/11 we must remember our fellow Americans who suffered at the hands of Foreign Terrorists.  But this day is also in Tribute to fallen “American Arizona Lawyers,” within Arizona, where there exists Domestic Terrorists, who are NOT upholding constitutional Oath promises, to defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic.  

In Arizona’s “Third World Justice” YOU can have any Decision YOU want, against ANY Arizona Lawyer YOU want, with the stroke of a keyboard and pen!

“Third World Justice in Arizona,” undermines equal access to justice within actual Courts of Record!

###

 

Four year Magistrate Judge approved FBI Raid against Former President Trump

  By

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Bruce Reinhart, Magistrate Judge within United States District Court Southern District of Florida, a four year rookie on the job, authorized an FBI Raid on Trump.  

Public Interest Concern Question:

Who is the supervising District Judge over Magistrate Judge (Rookie) Reinhart, that authorized Reinhart to execute an FBI Raid on Former President Trump?  Because “We the People-We the Taxpayer’s” want to know! Reinhart was only Appointed in 2018, as a Magistrate Judge with his term expiring 2026.

Did you know that “Magistrate Judges” are glorified Commissioners? 8 year Term Limits.

“The position of United States Magistrate Judge is relatively new in the federal judicial system. 

For many years the federal system had United States Commissioners who handled a variety of preliminary criminal matters, such as initial appearances, bonds, search warrants and arrest warrants. 

In 1971 the name “Commissioner” was changed to “Magistrate,” however, the range of duties performed was not greatly altered.

The name was changed again in 1990 to “United States Magistrate Judge.”

Federal District Judges are Nominated by a United States President.   A District Judges Term Limits on the Federal judicial bench are jobs for life. “These judges, often referred to as “Article III judges,” are nominated by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.”

Thus, Magistrates Powers do not appear for ANY Magistrate including Reinhart Magistrate, the power to authorize a Raid on Former President Trump.  Magistrates Powers are authorized in 18 U.S. Code § 3041.  See:  https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3041

Final Public Interest Concern Questions:

1).  Will the Court consider removing Reinhart Magistrate, off the Florida District Court bench?

2).  Whether Reinhart, Magistrate  exceeded his Powers? and

3).  Should Reinhart, Magistrate face ethical charges and be Disbarred as a Lawyer from the State of Florida?

Moffatt Media submitted a FOIA Request – Court commented:

“Please be advised that the federal courts are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”).  The “courts of the United States” are specifically exempted from that law by 5 U.S.C. § 551(1).”

Moffatt Media and concerned taxpayers respectfully request Judicial Watch to execute a Freedom of Information Act Request (FOIA), upon the USDC Southern District of Florida, to verify what District Judge authorized Reinhart Magistrate, an FBI Raid against Former President Trump, at his home?

Within real of possibility, maybe “Judicial Watch,” won’t receive the same type of comment from said court.  

Consequently, do realize ​Former President ​Trump​,​ is ​NOT the only one to be Raided, during these perilous times of society​ and all Americans are now at imminent risk.  You could be next!

###

 

 

Connie Reguli Arrested by DA

  By

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Recently reported to Moffatt Media, “I can’t talk right now I wanted you to know the DA is having me arrested again,” said Connie Reguli, Suspended Youth and Family Law Attorney.

Recall “Franklin, Tennessee – Judge Bill Acree, a stand-in for Judge Joseph Woodruff, who recused himself after the pre-trial proceedings, sentenced Connie Reguli to 30 days in jail and two years probation last Friday.” … ~ The Tennessee Tribune.

 

UPDATE#2 (8/16/2022) – Kim Helper, District Attorney General for the 21st Judicial District in Tennessee, arrested Reguli for a second time on August 12, 2022, Friday, said Reguli.

The second arrest, as well as the first arrest has been an assault on my First Amendment Constitutional Protections …  The second arrest criminal charge, “Aggravated Perjury,” was without providing a copy of the Grand Jury Indictment filed against me, says Reguli.

 

UPDATE#1 – Mugshot – Arrested for alleged “Aggravated Perjury”

Stand by while Moffatt Media does more fact gathering on Reguli’s second  arrest by DA.

###

Fortenberry Sentenced Community Service in Lieu of 15 year Prison Sentence

  By

Photo Credit: YOUTUBE https://youtu.be/VHcIBNazStw

Sentencing News – Politics Congress

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Moffatt Media First PR Media Company to Recommend Jeff Fortenberry receive “Community Service in Lieu of Prison”

Stanley Blumenfeld, Judge with the United States District Court – Central District,  was courageous in doing the right thing by Sentencing Fortenberry “320 hours of Community Service,” …  which is far better served to Fortenberry, Taxpayers and Society.  Additionally Fortenberry will be on Probation for two years and fined $25k.  Thus Fortenberry plans to Appeal his Sentencing imposed today.

Judge Blumenfeld and our legal community have to be aware that within the Indictment against Fortenberry, he was charged with False Statements under an outdated statute 18 U.S. Code §1001.  The same outdated statute that would have imposed  lopsided justice of “Mandatory Maximum Sentencing:” 15 years in prison (5 years x 3 felony counts) =15 years, that Fortenberry has now avoided thanks to Honorable Judge Blumenfeld.

Former Congressman Jeff Fortenberry did give this statement:  “All I’ve ever wanted to do is serve my country and try to help people. I am grateful for over 20 years of public service, and I’m proud of my record of accomplishments for Nebraska and for America.

I am thankful Judge Blumenfeld took the time to learn about who I am and what I have done in my life. And I am grateful he recognized that ‘by all accounts’ I am a man of ‘exceptional character.’ I was humbled today when the Judge noted that the testimony, including from government witnesses, established my honesty and integrity.

Having said that, this is a case that never should have been brought; and certainly not in California. As the Judge explained today, I knew nothing about the conspiracy to illegally funnel money to my campaign. I was kept in the dark about it, just like other candidates who received similar illegal campaign contributions. I trusted the FBI agents and prosecutors from the Department of Justice. They took advantage of that trust.

I will be appealing this verdict. We are continuing the fight for fairness that we’ve waged throughout this process. The issues at stake are much bigger than me. This case shows how the federal false statements statute can be weaponized by FBI and DOJ officials in a way Congress could not have contemplated when it was enacted and that it can be used to destroy the lives of even the most honorable people. On appeal, I will seek to change the way this dangerous statute is applied so it is less subject to abuse by the FBI and DOJ in the future.

This entire matter has been deeply traumatic for me and my family, but we’re still here, still standing. I’m grateful for the tremendous outpouring of support from friends all over the world. I’m especially grateful for the love and support of my family.”

Now as a Congressman who understands the absolute abuse of power brought by a select few corrupt individuals within the Justice Dept … my heart goes out to Congressman Fortenberry and his family for the injustice they have suffered,” said Rep. Rick Renzi

Congress, it is time to bring more attention to lopsided justice, federal “Mandatory Maximum Sentencing,” laws, especially outdated statutes such as 18 U.S. Code §1001.

  • Parting Public Interest Concern Question: Why did the Indictment fail to indicate if Grand Jurors and Prosecutors had criminally charged Fortenberry under 18 U.S. Code §1001, the old law of 1948 or new law of 1996?

###

 

Jeff Fortenberry Community Service in Lieu of Prison? Due to Biden’s Failure

  By , , , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: YOUTUBE https://youtu.be/VHcIBNazStw

Sentencing News – Politics

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Fortenberry served as a Congressional Rep., from 2005-2022 (17 years) and resigned on March 26, 2022, after pressure by Kevin McCarthy, House Minority Leader.    

June 28, 2022 Fortenberry is to be sentenced.  Fortenberry’s sentence was prompted by a federal Jury that found Fortenberry guilty on March 25, 2022.

Along with a Grand Jury Indictment, filed against Fortenberry back on 10/19/2021, in the United States District Court Central District of California. JEFF FORTENBERRY NEBRASA CONGRESSMAN GJ JUNE 2021

But Fortenberry pleaded not guilty for supposedly giving False Statements to FBI agents (2016) on $30k Foreign Campaign Donation, at a California Fundraising Event. 

Fortenberry has served as a Nebraska Congressional Rep., who now finds himself facing “Excessive Sentencing,” for alleged nonviolent offense.

  • Public Interest Concern Question:  Why did Tracy Wilkison, Prosecutor-Acting United States Attorney,  NOT affix her own signature onto the Indictment, against Fortenberry

Because Wilkison was not officially appointed as a United States Attorney for the Central District until November 16, 2021, by Merrick Garland, United States Attorney General.  

  • Second Public Interest Concern Question:  Why is Fortenberry facing a statutory “Mandatory Maximum   Sentencing?”

Because President Biden has failed to restore the United States Sentencing Commission, since January 21, 2020.

Did you know, that both Congressional Representatives Armstrong and Raskin said the lack of quorum also meant the commission cannot update the advisory sentencing guidelines needed to help implement the law, resulting potentially in its uneven application by judges across the country.  

Sadly Biden’s intentional act not to appoint ANY commissioners on the Sentencing Commission, takes another toll on our American criminal justice system!

Installing a new Sentencing Commission would help prevent “Excessive Sentencing” to reform criminal Mandatory Maximum Sentencing, that contribute towards: “Massive Incarceration,” even against alleged nonviolent offenders including Fortenberry.

Since Biden’s failure to restore the Sentencing Commission, Fortenberry’s Sentence should be put on STAY.

In consequence, Fortenberry’s landmark case is an example to now call on Congress with evaluating and reforming 18 U.S. Code §1001, that imposes a Mandatory Maximum Sentencing 5 years.  In Fortenberry case (5 years x 3 counts)=15 year sentence Fortenberry is facing in prison.

Noting, without restoring the United States Sentencing Commission, confidence in the uniformity and fairness of our criminal justice system is gone!

With a broken criminal justice system American Citizens like Fortenberry are now becoming the target of  false criminal charges conjured by American rogue prosecutors.   

Fortberry, will be sentenced on three felony charges, that carries Maximum 15 years in prison, which is an “Excessive Sentence,” even if Fortenberry were to serve one day in Prison away from his family. 

Now as a Congressman who understands the absolute abuse of power brought by a select few corrupt individuals within the Justice Dept … my heart goes out to Congressman Fortenberry and his family for the injustice they have suffered,” said Rep. Rick Renzi

The Judge in Fortenberry’s case can do the right thing by issuing Court Ordered Community Service to Fortenberry with preventing another “Excessive Sentencing,” scheme.

Congress, it is time to bring more attention to “Mandatory Maximum Sentencing,” laws!  Because these same laws cause cruel punishment and “Excessive Sentencing,” where logic does not hold especially towards nonviolent offenders. 

Thus, a 15 year “Mandatory Maximum Sentence” against Fortenberry would be an “Excessive Sentence.”

Kevin McCarthy Congressman had no immediate response.

###

Military Veteran No Vote for Lisa McClain Congressional Representative

  By , , , , , , , , , ,

INTERVIEW BY MOFFATT MEDIA WITH MILITARY VETERAN

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


Updated 5/21/2022, Saturday

Interview by Moffatt Media, Voting Insights with Randy Hayes, U.S. Military Veteran, says Vote “NO” for Lisa McClain for (2022) Congress.

Veteran Hayes said he will also be encouraging other Military Veterans to Vote “NO,” for Lisa McClain, during her upcoming  Congressional Reelection Campaign.

Moffatt Media: Randy, why are you voting “NO” for Lisa McClain Congressional Rep.?
Randy Hayes: I reached out to McClain’s Michigan and Washington DC Congressional Offices.   Because I was asking for Veterans Assistance and  was told that their offices weren’t able to help me even though I am a Military Veteran and live in her district.

I was only asking for Lisa McClain, Congressional Rep. to make a Congressional Inquiry to assist me with Visiting my Mother (Betty Hayes).  Since the Michigan Wayne County Probate Court, is causing Age Discrimination against my Mother.

My Mother is a protected class member under the Older Americans Act.  From what I have learned the Michigan Probate Court can’t discriminate against my Mother, who is age 87, while in receipt of Federal monies. 

Now back to Congressional Rep. McClain, all I wanted from her was to assist me as a Veteran, but both her Michigan and Washington D.C. offices claimed they couldn’t help me!

It’s really sad when McClain Congressional Rep. was not even willing to make a telephone call on my behalf as a Military Veteran.   Guess I was wrong to think that McClain Congressional Rep. provided Veteran Services.

I have no criminal record and I have never been arrested.    Again, how hard would it be for Congressional Rep. McClain to even make a simple telephone call to the Court, regarding visitations with my mother?
 
Moffatt Media: Randy, what military branch did you serve in?
Randy Hayes: I served in the Marine Corps Reserve from 1982-1988 and I missed Desert Storm.  From 1992-1995, I was in the Navy Seabees.

Moffatt Media: Randy why did you join the military?
Randy Hayes: I wanted to serve my country and be the best.

Moffatt Media: What age were you when you joined the Military?
Randy Hayes: 18

Moffatt Media: Randy you mentioned that you will be encouraging other Military Veterans to VOTE NO for Congressional Rep. McClain, what steps are you taking to spread the word, vote no on McClain?
Randy Hayes: I am a member of The American Legion, Post 351, Member of The Marine Corps League and I have over 2,000 friends on Facebook, who are mostly military veterans, that I will encourage them to VOTE NO for Ms. McClain.

Moffatt Media: Randy do you have any final words?
Randy Hayes: I have in the past supported Congressional Rep. McClain and  listened to too many of her speeches. Now I will gladly go to Ms. McClain’s opponents to discuss how she has no regard for supporting Veterans.  Because  Ms. McClain has the power to assist me and my mother with a simple telephone call due to the outrageous actions by the Wayne County Probate Court.

It’s time to stand up for those that have lost their “Elder Rights” by the Michigan Wayne County Probate Court.

Congresswoman McClain’s office had no immediate comment.

###

Rally Mask Mandates-Mandated Vaccine Passports

  By , ,

Rally Mask Mandates-Mandated Vaccine Passports

January 12, 2022, Wednesday

Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California
By: Moffatt Media Staff
Moffatt Media brings to you a Public Service Announcement

(“Rally Mask Mandates and Mandated Vaccine Passports”)
When: Today, 1/12/2022, Wednesday
Where: Palmdale, California – Front of City Council
Time: 6:00pm

Purpose: Rally Opposing – “Mask Mandates” and “Mandated Vaccine Passports” in the City of Palmdale, California
Take Action: Get involved with the Palmdale Freedom Coalition by Supporting this Rally. It is Time!
About Palmdale Freedom Coalition: “We believe that the government should not force vaccines or mask mandates on its citizens and that vaccine passports should be banned.” …
Today the City of Palmdale will vote whether or not to impose “Mask Mandates” and Mandated Vaccines.

###

Noose Hung now “Leaked” Sheriff’s Report Los Angeles County – reveals White Woman intentionally fabricated incitement of words claiming victim attacked by two Black Males

  By

7/25/2021

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Press Release Tribute – Emmett Louis Till)
By Moffatt Media Staff, Palmdale, California
Updated 8/28/2021, Saturday

“Noose Hung” now “Leaked” Sheriff’s Report Los Angeles County – reveals White Woman intentionally fabricated incitement of words – claiming victim attacked by two Black Males.

20th Century “Noose Hung.”    Question now becomes whether the incitement words used by just one White Woman, could send two Black Males to Prison?

The White Woman claimed Choked one day by a Black Male,  the next day Assaulted with a Deadly Weapon by another Black Male; and Where’s the Weapon?

Sadly the return of open racism, seems to be rearing its “Ugly Racist Head,” again and this time taking place within the City of Lancaster, California, a case based on one White Woman’s fabricated incitement words, alleged against two Black Males!

The White Woman’s incitement fabricated words were found in a “Leaked” Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Exempted Report,” now made into a Court public record June 9, 2021.

See California Superior Court, Case No. 19STCV30315, Michael Antonovich Courthouse, Lancaster California, this Case was filed by the White Woman and her California Lawyer, with malicious intent to result in fake criminal prosecution against a third person by using a White Male’s name, with entirely wrong description of the White Male.

The White woman and her California (CA) Lawyer intentionally camouflaged a civil complaint, arguing a state law code that corresponds with California Criminal Felony Penal Codes 240/242 Assault and Battery, with penalty of imprisonment, fines or both.

The White Woman’s California Lawyer (“Court Officer”), currently under 94 Felony Criminal Count Indictment out on Bail, for alleged $22 Million insurance fraud  scams, committed against various insurance companies, White Collar Crimes …

Picture

State of California Bar  gives only a “Consumer Alert,” regarding White Woman’s Lawyer listed above and are Ganong’s actions representative with the State Bar of California?

Day #1:   White Woman Jolena Halstead claimed she is a victim and was violently choked by a “Black male” on November 2, 2017.

Day #2:   Next day the same White Woman Jolena Halstead claimed to be a victim again and accused now second “Black male” of committing a violent offense: Assault with a Deadly Weapon against her person in the “Leaked” Sheriff’s Report dated November 3, 2017.

However, instead of White Woman Jolena Halstead, giving names of two suspected Black Males, she then uses the name of another male, this time being now a White Male, with entirely wrong description for the fabricated incident November 3, 2017.

Hence, “Leaked” Sheriff’s Report dated November 3, 2017, put into a court public record on June 9, 2021, moved in as an Exhibit by the White Woman and her California (CA) Lawyer, said in pertinent part:  “Assault with a Deadly Weapon, Suspect Black Male.   Suspect dragged White Woman out of her bedroom and using all his momentum and force, pushed her down the second floor staircase.” …

Amazingly, the “Leaked” Sheriff’s Report dated November 3, 2017, omits what weapon was used and where the supposed deadly weapon was committed against White Woman Jolena Halstead, by second suspect “Black Male?”

The 20th Century racist White Woman Jolena Halstead statements were nothing more than feeble fabricated statements conjured in her head due to a history of Meth and Marijuana drug abuse.

Sadly a confidential source said, instead of the White Woman Jolena Halstead, paying her rent when due, she decided to use it towards purchasing illegal street drugs.   Halstead also needed to come up with a stall tactic why didn’t have money now to pay for her housing.

July 2, 2021, Family Spokeswoman in a Bi-Racial Marriage with the White Male, has since demanded, that the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s File Criminal Perjury charges against White Woman named: Jolena Halstead and her CA Lawyer Philip W. Ganong, for filing a fabricated “Leaked” Sheriff’s Report, with the Court on June 9, 2021.

“There has to be a measure of accountability,” for committing Perjury against the State, Court, Public, two Black Males and a White Male. …

Family Spokeswoman hopes Los Angeles County Sheriff’s will do the right thing, remove its “Leaked” Exempted “Incident Report” dated November 3, 2017, from the Court public record at Michael Antonovich Courthouse.

July 6, 2021, Family Spokeswoman concluded by saying, even though her family’s origins are from the deep south of Tuskegee Alabama, where segregated schools existed during the Jim Crow era, they were still taught to be color blinded and love your neighbor like you love yourself.

The Family Spokeswoman was even proud to admit that her Grandfather and Father were both Deputy Sheriff’s serving a total 13 years during some of the most horrific times in Deep South Alabama.

A public apology is paramount to be made by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s, because someone within its own agency “Leaked” Sheriff’s Exempted fabricated “Incident Report,” dated November 3, 2017, on June 9, 2021, filed into a court public record.