FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Updated 1/4/2025, Sunday
Arizona Lawyers not disbarred for Sexual Harassment’s or Sexual Assaults.
But if an Arizona Lawyer asks for a “PIC” from a NON-LEGAL client he or she will find themselves Disbarred.
Reasonable observers would agree that SEX and LAW do NOT mix. Contrary to the State Bar of Arizona, because they give get out of Jail Free Cards to their favored Lawyers even when charged to have committed Sexual Harassment’s against clients and others.
One Arizona Lawyer NOT disbarred asked one of his clients: “During the initial interview, Piatt asked her whether she had ever masturbated at the age of fourteen.” … “even better if her skirt were four inches shorter.”
Did you know the Arizona Bar allows its Lawyers to have SEX with Prospect Legal Clients under its Ethical Rule 1.8(j) Rule? But asking for a “PIC,” will get an Arizona Lawyer Disbarred, law degree, undergraduate college degrees and legal careers wiped out overnight; along with livelihood destroyed. Arizona lawyers are denied equal access to justice and when charged NOT given a Jury Trial among their peers.
Did you also know that the Arizona Bar even offers “Get out of Jail Free Cards,” and no Disbarments against Arizona Lawyers and Judges who commit Sexual Harassment’s and Sexual Misconduct?
Justice Hijacked through Sexual Misconduct so long as consensual SEX freak offs are done before AZ Lawyer signs a Retainer Contract with a Prospect Legal client? See AZ Bar, Rule 42 ER 1.8(j), and too mean ER: Ethical Rule. See Ethical Rule (Policy-Guideline) Section 1.8(j) at: https://web.archive.org/web/20230307052151/https://www.azbar.org/for-lawyers/ethics/rules-of-professional-conduct/
“Well connected attorneys and judges who have actually engaged in sexual misconduct were only censured, put on probation, or suspended 1-2 years,” NEVER DISBARRED,” ̴The Rachel Alexander Show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bLmfCnkhHU
Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #1 –
- CHARNA JOHNSON
“Johnson claimed to communicate with the dead, and had sexual contact with a client.” Johnson was merely “suspended from the practice of law for one year and ordered to serve two years of probation upon reinstatement.” Johnson was NOT Disbarred.
See Source:
Other Source:
Published July 24, 2025 – https://moffattmedia.com/sex-with-prospect-legal-clients-is-allowed-by-the-state-bar-of-arizona/
Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #2
- JUDGE TED ABRAMS – NOT DISBARRED
William J. O’Neil, Arizona Supreme Court PDJ-(ALJ), merely suspended Abrams for two years and barred him from being a judge. Here is Abrams’ extensive history of sexual harassment, as reported by The AZ Central:
During a 14-month period, the judge sent the unidentified public defender at least 28 voicemails and 85 text messages, many of which were sexually suggestive (at least one was, he admitted, “obscene,” and described a sex act he wanted to perform on her), repeatedly pressured her for sex, made slurping noises and at one point fondled her buttock. In response, the public defender said she wasn’t interested, repeatedly told him that it would be inappropriate for them to have a relationship because he was a judge, she worked in his courtroom and he was married. She called him “crazy and disgusting.”
Abrams, 47, also had a sexual relationship with another attorney, a private defense lawyer who appeared in his court, and he sent sexually explicit e-mails to a third attorney, an assistant city prosecutor who appeared in his court.
The state bar brief said the judge “victimized a young lawyer for his own personal gratification and when she did not enjoy, welcome or otherwise relent to his constant requests for sexual contact, he berated and humiliated her from the bench during a jury trial.” The victim also said Abrams told her that it would not be good for her career if she rejected his advances. After the short suspension, it appears that he is about to be reinstated to the Arizona bar.
Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #3
- MATTHEW SCHULTZ
Attorney Matthew Schultz admitted he had a sexual relationship with a client, and was just suspended for one year.
See Source:
Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #4
- ROBERT STANDAGE
Government attorney Robert Standage… actually did send sexual images and videos to an existing client. He was already on probation for a previous incident, but Judge O’Neil merely suspended him for two years. See Court Case NO.: PDJ 2015-9007 – SBA File #14-0367 Filed 06-29-2015.
See Source:
https://web.archive.org/web/20161226184003/http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/101/Standage%20Web.pdf
Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #5
- FRED ACKEL JUDGE PUNISHED BY ARIZONA SUPREME CT
Fred Ackel, another judge, was punished by the Arizona Supreme Court for his sexual misbehavior with a mere censure. Not even suspension, probation, etc.
A litigant who appeared in front of Ackel to stop a man from harassing her, was — ironically — so disturbed by the judge’s constant sexual remarks and attempt to have a romantic relationship with her, that she started tape recording him. His comments about sex were extraordinarily vulgar. Perhaps most disturbing, he told her in regards to the man harassing her, “If I have to raise some more hell, I’ll have him arrested.”
The court said in its opinion, “We agree with the Commission that Ackel’s conduct toward Randall constituted willful misconduct.” The court also noted that he’d had six prior complaints — and one they considered an aggravating factor, where he had called a female attorney during a pretrial conference “darling,” and commented on her legs. In fact, the court found a second aggravating factor, “Ackel’s regular use of endearing terms toward and physical contact with women.” See Source https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/supreme-court/1987/87-0001-2.html
Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #6
- WILLIAM M. PIATT, IV
Piatt Censured and probation for Sexual Harassment against two clients. (Not Disbarred)
“During the initial interview, Piatt asked her whether she had ever masturbated at the age of fourteen. In a later meeting, he told her she looked delicious and that it would be even better if her skirt were four inches shorter.’ … See Source: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/az-supreme-court/1453902.html
Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #7
- WILLIAM J. WALKER
Walker an attorney was “censured for touching a client’s breast.” (NOT disbarred). See Source:
https://www.studicata.com/summaries/supreme-court-of-arizona/in-the-matter-of-walker-2001-4mbein/
Arizona Lawyer (Prosecutor) SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #8
- NANCY DEAN, Prosecutor had an affair with MICHALE C. NELSON Superior Court Judge.
Dean was placed on six month suspension and Judge Nelson resigned. (Not Disbarred). See Source:
https://www.azapp.com/blog/in-the-matter-of-dean-3-28-2006/
Arizona Lawyer (Prosecutor) SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #9
- JUAN MARTINEZ
“The complaint involved allegations that Martinez sexually harassed women he worked with at the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office.”
“In 2019, the State Bar filed a formal complaint against Martinez alleging misconduct.” …
Martinez, Consented to Disbarment and was NOT disbarred.
But the most eye-opening eyebrow raising disciplinary measure meted out by the State Bar of Arizona, was the permanent disbarment of attorney Jeffrey Moffatt who had asked for a “pic” from a potential client named Lisa Childers in 2013, on Facebook and a pic that Moffatt never even received. Childers filed a complaint against Moffatt and the State Bar of New Mexico took the matter under review concluding Childers was NOT legally a client and dismissed the matter for lacking jurisdiction.
Childers in 2016 confided via Confession Audio Tape with the Carlsbad Police Department for Felony political extortion schemes between her and felon boyfriend Hershal “Pat” Spurlin,” against Moffatt and his wife.
Three years later in April 2016, when Moffatt was running for a seat in the United States Congress as a Republican, the Arizona State Bar decided to throw the book at Moffatt, disbarring him from state practice of law.
To many following the Moffatt case, the conspicuously harsh treatment of Moffatt coupled with its timing occurring in the heat of a political campaign three years after the alleged incident occurred, sticks out like a sore thumb as a great injustice brought about by questionable means.
In the United States of America where the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution requires equal treatment under the law for all citizens, the treatment of Moffatt as compared to other legal professionals in the State of Arizona who have committed much more egregious acts, Moffatt’s treatment stands alone in its severity.
Moffatt’s law firm findings revealed that the Arizona State Bar exceeded jurisdiction and authority to disbar Moffatt. This matter has been litigated in Federal Civil Court since 2017, because Moffatt filed a $10 Million lawsuit against the Arizona Bar, State Supreme Court of Arizona, State of Arizona and former Chief Justice Bales. The case is pending Reinstatement.
The question then becomes why the Disparate Treatment against Former Arizona Lawyer Jeffrey Dean Moffatt, because Moffatt asked for a “PIC”.” Findings by Moffatt’s former law firm revealed the Decision and Order Imposing Sanctions and Final Judgment and Order of Disbarment, are fatally facially FRAUDULENT documents, because Presiding Disciplinary Judge aka Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), was “unlawfully seated.”
Perhaps it is time to take a look into Arizona Lawyers who have committed actual sexual offenses against clients … and give the same equal treatment of Disbarment retroactively similar to Moffatt. Alternative remedies SUSPEND the Arizona Bar ER (Ethical Rule) 1.8(j), mirrored after the American Bar Association (ABA) and Reinstate Moffatt to the State Bar of Arizona.
###
