
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Arizona Lawyer SEX Freak off Spotlight Case #1 – State Bar of Arizona (SBA), you didn’t disbar your Arizona Lawyer: Charna Johnson. You reported in part: “Johnson claimed to communicate with the dead, and had sexual contact with a client.” Johnson was merely “suspended from the practice of law for one year and ordered to serve two years of probation upon reinstatement.” Johnson was NOT Disbarred.
(SBA) lets refresh your memory in part from your Press Release:

…“The State Bar of Arizona initiated an investigation after finding probable cause that Johnson had lied under oath in a disciplinary hearing, claimed to communicate with the dead, and had sexual contact with a client.”
“Johnson’s client claimed that she began to communicate his ex-wife’s thoughts to him and initiated ongoing communication with him as his wife. He also claimed that he and Johnson engaged in sexual conduct.” … Again Johnson was NOT Disbarred.
SEX with prospect legal clients is allowed as long as the Lawyer has “consensual sex,” before signing a Retainer Agreement. See State Bar of Arizona Ethical Rule 42 Section1.8 (j) reads in pertinent part:
“[a] lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced.”
Yet Rule 42 Section 1.8((j) promotes Sexual Exploitation, Sexual Harassment’s, Sexual Assaults against court clerks, individuals who are already mentally and financially vulnerable when seeking legal help.
1.8(j) allows an Arizona Lawyer to get their freak offs before signing a Retainer Agreement. This pattern and practice of the 1.8(j) must be SUSPENDED and investigated immediately for societal immorality in preventing individuals from being targeted for SEX before signing a Retainer Agreement, with an Arizona Lawyer.
(SBA) now compare with the other Arizona Lawyer who only jokingly asked for a mere “PIC” from a woman during his private time on Facebook, in 2013; the same woman who never became a legal client; and the same woman, wherein the State of New Mexico Carlsbad Police Department, were able to obtain Confession Audio Tapes, that the woman named: Lisa Childers and boyfriend Pat Hershal Spurlin, had committed $25k political extortion schemes against the Arizona Lawyer and his wife running for Senate.
Detective Brian Burke, advised that Spurlin accepted a Class Three Felony Charge. Detective Burke then submitted to both the FBI and the District Attorney’s Office for filing Criminal charges in Report # S1602144.
However, you State Bar of Arizona (SBA), Disbarred the other Arizona Lawyer for the mere asking of a “PIC,” during private time on Facebook. Did you (SBA) forget Freedom of Speech is protected under both State and Federal Constitutional laws? Yet you criminally charged the other Arizona Lawyer under your Rule 8.4(b), criminal sui generis.
Watch and Listen at below YouTube Source Link to how William J. O’Neil, State Employee of the Supreme Court (FAKE JUDGE), who brags about criminal sui generis proceedings. See at footage: 2:26 and at 1.29 Introduced: “Judge William J. O’Neil, Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court here in Arizona,” said Little.
SBA, remember you gave your middle finger to the AZ House Legislatures Judiciary Committee, when they highly recommended that the State Supreme Court of Arizona, implement First Amendment Protections, for Arizona Lawyers.
Last time Moffatt Media checked an agency like the AZ Supreme Court, is in receipt of Federal Financial Assistance and must uphold First Amendment Constitutional protections for all individuals and persons also defined as Arizona Lawyers.
PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTIONS
(SBA) why the favoritism treatment with Spotlight Case #1 Charna Johnson, who was only suspended for one year?
- Disparate Treatment: Why the Disparate Treatment against Jeffrey Dean Moffatt, with your purported Disbarment when Moffatt only asked for a “PIC” and did NOT f..king (have SEX), with the Prospect Legal Client: Lisa Childers?
Maybe Moffatt would have been better off to have had SEX with prospective legal client Childers and Moffatt probably would have only been Suspended instead of Disbarred.
California State Bar –
Position the “California Bar” has taken to “ban” … “sex between lawyers and their clients. See Reference Source by Associated Press:
SEX BAN: “The sex ban has divided the rules revision commission, though similar restrictions are in place in other states. As of May 2015, 17 states had adopted a blanket sex ban drafted by the American Bar Association, according to an ABA committee that looked at implementation of the group’s ban.”
Source Link:
Jeffrey Dean Moffatt, Disparate Treatment Victim #2 induced 2016 Fraudulent Disbarment.
###






