• Moffatt Media America's Taxpayer Watchdog News

Category: Press Release

“Arizona” Spit in the face of Veteran

  By

DISABLED VIETNAM VETERAN SPEAKS ON 2024 VETERANS DAY

Moffatt Media,  Palmdale, California —

Honorable Disabled Vietnam Veteran says not only spit in the face by Arizona on American soil, but has suffered Human Rights Violations with a fatal “kill” to his forty year legal career.

INTERVIEW

Star Moffatt, Founder and CEO of Moffatt Media (M&M) is proud to share an interview with  Tony Guajardo, Former Assistant United States Attorney, Arizona Attorney and Disabled Vietnam Veteran.

 

Moffatt Media:   Tony explain what happened to your legal career as an Arizona Attorney?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo:  The Arizona Supreme Court failed to  rule on an issue of a state employee committing False Impersonation from the Supreme Court bench, who issued out a Fraudulent Disbarment (revocation against my Arizona Lawyers license).

Moffatt Media:  What legal career paths have you had that make you so proud in serving our country United States of America  and other people?      

Veteran Tony Guajardo:

  • I was appointed as Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of Texas in 1980 where I worked until 1983.
  • Administrative Law Judge and Senior Trial Attorney with the EEOC from 1983 until 1988;
  • Trial Attorney with the EEOC;
  • Federal Bar Association President (San Antonio Chapter)
  • Bexar County Criminal District Attorney;
  • Staff Attorney with the Gulf Coast Legal Foundation;
  • Staff Attorney with the Rio Grande Legal Aid; and
  • Twenty Years in Private Practice of Law.
  • I practiced law for forty years from 1977 to 2017, wherein I represented literally thousands of clients and having been licensed in Texas in 1977 and in Arizona in 2002.

 

Moffatt Media:  Tony where are you originally from and your age?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo:   I am originally from San Antonio, Texas, and I will be 78 years old in March 2025.

 

Moffatt Media: Are you currently single or married?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo:  I am married. I am originally from San Antonio, Texas. I am involuntarily retired and I try to stay healthy with a healthy diet and exercise

 

Moffatt Media:  Do you have any children?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo:  I have two adult children and two grandchildren.

 

Moffatt Media:  Were you born in the United States?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo:  Yes.  I was born in San Antonio, Texas of a Mexican immigrant father who later became a United States Citizen. I am a first generation son of immigrant parents.

 

Moffatt Media:  Tony  you  had served in the USA Military, where were you stationed?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo: I served in Vietnam 1967

 

Moffatt Media:  Were you drafted or did you enlist?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo No.  I enlisted in October 1967.

 

Moffatt Media:  Do you recall your first days in Vietnam and what did it feel like?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo:  No. I blocked everything out mentally about Vietnam.  I worked in the 149th Tactical Hospital and I was a Medic.

 

Moffatt Media:  Why did you join the military?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo:  I joined the military, because I wanted to serve my country USA, during time of war. I served 8 years in the 149th Tactical Fighter Group (Medic).

 

Moffatt Media:  What law school did you attend?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo:  I attended David C. Clarke District of Columbia Law School in Washington, D.C. and I graduated law school 1977.

 

Moffatt Media:  Now fast forwarding to your legal career, why did you want to become an Attorney?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo:  I became an attorney because I wanted to make a positive difference in people’s lives. As a first generation son of immigrant parents I saw how people struggled to achieve the American Dream having to overcome obstacles of income inequality and other discrimination, I jumped at the chance to go to law school.

My hopes and dreams for myself were mirrored in those faces of hundreds of clients who desperately needed help.

I wanted to be a blessing for others, and at the same time find my purpose in life—to be an advocate for those who would not otherwise be able to navigate the treacherous waters in life.

 

Moffatt Media:  Are there any significant milestone cases that have an everlasting societal footprints?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo:  I am a former attorney admitted to the United States Supreme Court, having served as Plaintiffs’ Co-counsel in a U.S. Supreme Court Case that struck down an unconstitutional law that prohibited undocumented children from attending a free public education in 1980

I was Co-counsel in another U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Texas unconstitutional law that denied undocumented children the right to attend public school in Texas.

Also, I was Co-counsel in challenging SB1070, a law that unlawfully discriminated against Hispanics and other minorities in violation of the United States Constitution.

Moffatt Media:  Do you have any final words you would like to say regarding the Human Rights Violations suffered by Arizona?

  • Veteran Tony Guajardo:  Arizona provided the murder weapon to the State Supreme Court and they proceeded to fatally “kill” my forty year legal career, while denying my constitutional rights. 

The State Supreme Court of Arizona has committed Human Rights Violations against many Arizona Lawyers, destroying their lives and careers, which have taken decades to build.   Arizona’s abuse of power continues to go unchecked.   I want Justice, and I want my life back!

Moffatt Media thanks  Tony Guajardo for serving our country and other Veterans!

Society owes you a debt of appreciation along with other Veteran brave men and women who have risked their own lives to make our lives beyond safe. 

Tony Guajardo, Disabled Vietnam Veteran, thank you for sharing your horrific story of being spit in your face by Arizona.  

In the opinion of Moffatt Media, Arizona is a disgraced state and should have their Federal Funding Sanctioned, equal the number of days (Tony) has suffered Human Rights Violations imposed by Arizona.

In addition to, the Arizona Supreme Court Rule 51, be Suspended since it is NOT law, is unconstitutional and only an administrative Rule, nothing more than a (policy guideline).  Sadly, Tony is not alone, there are many other attorney victims in Arizona, that have also suffered Human Rights Violations, Fraudulent Suspensions and Disbarments  by Arizona’s Supreme Court Presiding Disciplinary Judges (State employees), committing Judicial False Impersonations while  unconstitutionally seated-under Rule 51.   

Arizona’s Human Rights Violations are better said to be: Crimes against Humanity, by the shameful and disgraced Arizona Supreme Court!

 Ep1 Series 1 – Stay tuned for more.

    ###

 

 

 

 

2024 “Maine Trump Voter” Speaks

  By

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Moffatt Media, Palmdale, California

2024 Voter: State of  Maine, Trump Voter-speaks before Moffatt Media – WHY they’re voting for “Trump.”

Maine Voter’s words will blow your mind away! Click on the below arrow to Watch and Listen to this VIDEO, which will only take 1 Minute out of your busy day!

 

Maine Voter says has some personal reasons why voting for Trump ranging from: witnessing USA’s corrupt  judicial system; In-effective Assistance of Counsel and detest Open Borders.

Behind the Scenes:  Maine Voter goes on to say that Open Borders are  a paramount safety risk to all American Citizens, especially when persons crossing  into our country are not vetted. 

 

Get out to Vote –  Re-elect Donald J. Trump, 2024 President!

Rock on Maine Voter!

###

Cease & Desists DOC’S Served on FHFA 

  By

October 29, 2024, Tuesday

PUBLIC INTEREST NOTICE  – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

By  Star Moffatt, CEO & Founder / Investigative Journalist / Palmdale, CA (Moffatt Media) —

Moffatt Media (OPM) Federally Recognized Taxpayer Watchdog News, on behalf of Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s, Retiree’s, & Veterans served three demands for Cease and Desists; and Suspend 2025-2027 FHFA’s Enterprise Housing Goals, attempted impositions against GSE’s also known as: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

 

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), is only a mere administrative agency NOT in compliance with the Federal APA, SEC v. Jarkesy, 144 S. Ct. 2117 (2024); and Loper Bright Enters. V. Raimondo, 144 S. Ct. 2244 (2024).

In Jarkesy, the Court found that agency power cannot strip a Taxpayer of Constitutional Rights.  In Loper, the Court found that the courts cannot give deference to agency rulings on matters of law overruling the Chevron Doctrine.

In this matter before the public (FHFA), must have a Judicial Review before a Court of Record or (FHFA) modify its proposed 2025-2027 Enterprise Housing Goals, to include clear and precise content language to do the following:

1).  “CEASE & DESIST”  the purported 16 year Conservatorship without a Court Order;

2).  “SUSPEND” 2025-2027 Enterprise Housing Goals for reliance on DIED LAW –inoperative; and

3).  “CEASE & DESIST” illegally withholding 100% Dividends without Court Order.

 

DOC #1, Served on FHFA on October 16, 2024 

Link intentionally not embeded for ease of novice readers – Read more by clicking on the Link below at:

https://moffattmedia.com/fhfa-cease-and-desist-conservatorship-over-fannie-mae/

 

_____

DOC #2 Served on FHFA October 24, 2024

Link intentionally not embeded for ease of novice readers –  Read more by clicking on the Link below at:

https://www.fhfa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/07%2005pm10%2024%202024%20THURSDAY%20%20SUSPEND%202025%202027%20PROPOSED%20ENTERPRISE%20HOUSNG%20GOALS.pdf

 

____

DOC #3 Served on FHFA October 28, 2024

Link intentionally not embeded for ease of novice readers – Read more by clicking on the Link below at:

https://www.fhfa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/10%2028%202024%20Monday%2012%2022am%20DEMAND%20CEASE%20AND%20DESIST%20ILLEGAL%20WITHHOLDING%20OF%20PROFITS%20FROM%20FANNIE%20and%20FREDDIE.pdf

###

FHFA “Cease and Desist” Conservatorship over Fannie Mae

Link

  By

PUBLIC NOTICE  – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

By  Star Moffatt, CEO & Founder / Investigative Journalist / Palmdale, CA (Moffatt Media) —

Federal Housing Finance Agency | Washington D.C. DC

FHFA “Cease & Desist” Conservatorship over Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac

October 16, 2024, Wednesday

SENT VIA EMAIL

[email protected]

[email protected]

Sandra L. Thompson, Honorable Director 

 RE: RIN-2590-AB34 – DOC #2024-19261- Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) – Conservator of Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac

 

 

Dear Ms. Thompson, Honorable Director & (FHFA):

Taxpayer’s … OPPOSE (FHFA) 2025-2027 Benchmark Housing Goals Omits 16 year TERMINATION of CONSERVATORSHIP 

Moffatt Media (OPM) Federally Recognized Taxpayer Watchdog News, on behalf of Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s, Retiree’s, & Veterans submit a public comment to OPPOSE (FHFA) 2025-2027 Benchmark Housing Goals.  

Why:  Because FHFA’s projected 2025-2027 Housing Goals OMIT to include ANY benchmarks for TERMINATION of CONSERVATORSHIP against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac corporations.

          Moffatt Media on behalf of Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s, Retiree’s, & Veteran’s DEMAND, that (FHFA), immediately Cease & Desist CONSERVATORSHIP against Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, inclusive within FHFAs 2025-2027 Housing Goals. DOC #2024-19261

Recall (FHFA) your role is of an administrative agency and that’s it!  However, only as a mere administrative agency,  you  imposed  CONSERVATORSHIP against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac corporations, who have NEVER been criminally indicted or convicted of committing any crimes against the United States of America, Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s, Retiree’s & Veteran’s.   

         Thus, the United States Supreme Court has sounded its horn about administrative agencies, which would include (FHFA), in two recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court expose, and now declare unlawful, administrative agencies such as: (FHFA), that take actions against Taxpayer Citizen’s … that affect their private rights.  SEC v. Jarkesy, 144 S. Ct. 2117 (2024); and Loper Bright Enters. V. Raimondo, 144 S. Ct. 2244 (2024).

Note throughout this Public Comment Demand Letter “Cease & Desist,” document,

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, will be referenced:  Fannie/Freddie

Treat this timely Public Comment being submitted before  (FHFA), on behalf Shareholders, which make up: Taxpayer’s, Retiree’s, & Veterans, do OPPOSE FHFA’s 2025-2027 benchmark goals.     

Proper administrative guidance, not punishment should be the goal of (FHFA) moving forward with terminating Conservatorships against Fannie / Freddie and inclusive of your 2025-2027 Housing Goals!

Recall in the year 2008 and now fast forward 2024, Shareholders have been denied their Shareholder Rights to Vote, for the continued Conservatorships against Fannie/Freddie.   Another denial of Shareholder Rights to Vote within FHFA’s proposed 2025-2027 Enterprise Housing Goals, is a smack in the face among all Shareholders by not valuing Shareholders.      https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shareholder-value.asp

Without the Shareholders best interest corporations like Fannie/Freddie would not exist, because Shareholders contribute revenue for reinvesting, building up and expanding continued growth of corporations such as:  Fannie/Freddie.  Shareholder’s do in fact have a value to Fannie/Freddie and should not be excluded from FHFA’s 2025-2027 Housing Goals projected benchmarks. 

         This public comment has a nexus to:   RIN-2590-AB34. Entitled: 2025-2027 Enterprise Housing Goals. Proposed Rulemaking, 12 CFR Part 1282 “as required by the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992.” 

Source Link: https://www.fhfa.gov/regulation/federal-register/proposed-rulemaking/2025-2027-enterprise-housing-goals

There has never been ANY criminal liability imposed against Fannie or Freddie and as such (FHFA), your Conservatorship actions from 2008 through 2024, now 16 years imposed, is only a mere administrative action against Fannie/Freddie. 

Therefore the Conservatorships against Fannie / Freddie has been without good cause, illegal and warrants immediate TERMINATION of CONSERVATORSHIP imposed against Fannie/Freddie.     

        Furthermore, Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s, Retiree’s & Veteran’s also issue this Demand Letter against (FHFA) to Cease and Desist the unconstitutional pattern and practice of sweeping over profits into the United States Treasury, without consent of Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s Retiree’s & Veteran’s.  Because the sweeping of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac profits are being done on an administrative Federal Conservatorship level, that is not in compliance with the Federal Administrative Procedure Act (APA).  

       (FHFA)  your proposed 2025-2027 Housing Goals have actually been ongoing and in origin from the actual 2008 HOUSING AND ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT, better known as HERA, that was imposed on Fannie / Freddie.

      Yet the HERA Act of 2008 seems nothing more than a taking of corporations Fannie / Freddie, with an illegal regressive redistribution of Profits.  Banks got bailed out while Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s Retiree’s & Veteran’s and Disabled got wiped-out. 

      More importantly, the ongoing sweeping of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac profits are being done in conflict with two recent landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases that will be depicted below in more detail.   

     Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s Retiree’s & Veteran’s OPPOSE FHFA’s 2025-2027 Enterprise Housing Goals, for failure to include at least a proposed benchmark to TERMINATE Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from Conservatorship 1st Quarter ending 2025.  The same Conservatorship that did not have a reasonable minded term Conservatorship for the true meaning of “Temporary.” Conservatorship.   Instead having a “Permanent” Conservatorship of 16 years now (2008-2024) and round up 20 years.  

     Furthermore Government documents do NOT indicate there was a public Shareholder vote for the government administrative agency named: Federal Housing Financing Agency (FHFA), to impose (2008-2024) Conservatorship against Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.

WHEREAS SHAREHOLDERS of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, do agree and demand that (FHFA) immediately “Terminate” the sixteen (16) year Conservatorship against Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.

WHEREAS SHAREHOLDER’S do agree (FHFA) to IMMEDIATELY “Cease & Desist,” sweeping all profits of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, into the U.S. Treasury, without good cause and without a National Emergency being declared from 2008 to presently 2024. 

WHEREAS SHAREHOLDER’S do collectively agree that (FHFA) “Cease & Desist” sweeping schemes of Shareholder Dividends into the U.S. Treasury, because from 2008 to presently 2024, there has not been ANY U.S. President to justify Dividend sweeping schemes via through a National Emergency. 

      This document is a Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s Retiree’s & Veteran’s demand that (FHFA), cease and desist the unconstitutional practice of an Administrative Conservatorship over the Fannie and Freddie from 2008 to present October 2024. Because the Conservatorship did not receive ANY approval from Shareholders … within the Fannie or Freddie corporations.  

       Do you know (FHFA), that all administrative agencies whether in the executive, judicial, or legislative branch have been stripped of authority to adjudicate the private rights of Taxpayer Citizen’s by the United States Supreme Court?  

 

DEMAND IS MADE UNDER THE AUTHORITY TWO RECENT UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CASES 

     Two recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court expose, and now declare unlawful, administrative agencies such as (FHFA) that take actions against Taxpayer Citizen’s … that affect their private rights.  SEC v. Jarkesy, 144 S. Ct. 2117 (2024); Loper Bright Enters. V. Raimondo, 144 S. Ct. 2244 (2024).

      In Jarkesy, the Court found that agency power cannot strip a Taxpayer of Constitutional rights.  In Loper, the Court found that the courts cannot give deference to agency rulings on matters of law overruling the Chevron doctrine. 

     In Jarkesy, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated an administrative adjudication against Jarkesy for securities fraud and sanctions. When this case made it to the United States Supreme Court, the actions by the administrative court were reversed. 

     In Loper, the United States Supreme Court overruled the Chevron doctrine which required the ‘reviewing court’ to give binding deference to the agency on questions of law and interpretation of the law in its adjudications. The Supreme Court opined in Loper that it was the ‘proper and peculiar province of the courts’ to interpret the law, not the agency. The mindset of the United States Supreme Court would be the same in application to (FHFA). Therefore, the court had to decide all relevant questions of law and interpret statutory provisions.  Loper Bright Enterprises, et al. v. Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al., 144 S. Ct. 2244 (June 28, 2024) 

    In Loper, the state governments argued that the Chevron deference doctrine should be abandoned and argued that the ‘broad deference’ standard motivated agencies to wield vast powers.  The states all agreed that it is the judiciary’s role to have the final say in what the law is, even when an agency is involved and this would include: (FHFA).   

   For all the foregoing reasons mentioned above, Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s, Retiree’s & Veterans OPPOSE (FHFA) 2025-2027 Housing Goals.  

 

WHEREASTaxpayer’s, Shareholders, Retirees & Veteran’s issue this Demand letter document to immediately Cease and Desist, the Administrative Conservatorship over  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, because the Conservatorship was done without Shareholder-Voter Approvals.   Failure by (FHFA) to uphold this Cease and Desist the illegal Conservatorship, which adversely impacts Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s … will be forced next to file a court action against (FHFA), for an Emergency Injunction Temporary Restraining Order, (TRO). 

CONCLUSION

     Moffatt Media on behalf of Taxpayer’s, Shareholder’s, Retiree’s  & Veteran’s look forward to hearing back  from you  (FHFA), promptly regarding the above OPPOSITION Public Comment, that can be resolved amicably to mitigate 2025-2027 Benchmark Housing Goals of (FHFA). 

     Hence, at the end of said day, (FHFA), you’re only a mere administrative agency and NOT a ‘Court of Record,’ to interpret constitutional laws or impose Conservatorships that are NEVER ending over ANY corporations, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. 

Sincerely,  

/s/

Moffatt Media Taxpayer Watchdog News,

Star Moffatt, CEO of Moffatt Media 

Telephone No.: (661) 435-2487

Web Address:  https://moffattmedia.com/about-us/

Email address: [email protected]

 

 

 

 

 

Lashinda Demus will receive 2012 Gold Medal 2024 Paris Olympics

  By

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

By  Star Moffatt, CEO & Founder / Investigative Journalist / Palmdale, CA (Moffatt Media) —

Real Talk – Real Facts:  An athlete works a lifetime preparing for the Olympics, with many falling short.  Here we have a hero: Lashinda Demus 400m Hurdler who was cheated out of the 2012 Gold Medal.   

Twelve years later during the 2024 Paris Olympics Demus will get her legitimate 2012 Gold, on August 9.

Demus had learned from Olympic officials she was cheated out of her 2012 Gold Medal, because Russian opponent used a Doping Scheme.

Demus represented the USA in the 2012 London Olympics and proudly accepted a Silver Medal.

Demus has already won two Gold Medals in the World Finals and now will receive her long overdue Olympic Gold Medal representing the USA retroactive from 2012, better late than never, even if 12 years later.

The thought of having my mom, Yolanda, by my side in Paris fills me with joy. She was my coach in London, and now she’ll be there to witness this momentous occasion. The same with my dad who has been with me every step of the way.    I will finally kiss my medal as the champion of the 400-meter hurdles race from the Olympic Games London 2012, said Demus.

“Palmdale is known as the ‘Aerospace Capital of America,’ but we’ve had our share of Olympic athletes over the years as well.”  “Lashinda is a world class athlete and a world class mother who represented Palmdale with class, style and dignity as she ran for our country in the Summer Olympics in London.  We were all rooting for her and now we’d like to say ‘thank you’ to her at the city’s 50th birthday celebration,” said Palmdale’s Communications Manager John Mlynar (2012).

Demus 2024 is a role model to many girls, young women and other athletes proving “Doping Schemes,” by cheaters, undermine the spirit of true athletes.

Doping:  “We have become fixated on doping because it is measurable and the fight against it feels scientific, yet even if we eliminate it, we won’t get rid of inequality in sport,”   says New Scientist.

Moffatt Media commends Lashinda Demus with receiving her 2012 Gold Medal in the 2024 Paris Olympics!

Lashinda, be forever proud in representing the USA inclusive the Antelope Valley community.   Remember things don’t always happen on our timing. Example you’re receiving your long overdue “Gold Medal,” in 2024, that you originally earned within the 2012 Olympics.

Demus deserves to be recognized in the USA and internationally for earning her legitimate 2012 Olympic Gold Medal, from her many years of hard work, blood sweat and tears.

 

CEO Sidebar:  My husband Jeff was inches away from making the Olympic team himself, winning National recognition in multiple age group categories, but losing out the top spot to a multiple time Olympian. My husband feels the athletic bond with Demus, in a way only life time athletes can understand.  Just making the Olympic team that thousands of individuals attempt is a lifelong ambition many do not obtain, says Jeff.

Lashinda to be an Olympic champion 2012 Gold Medalist even delayed a decade later in 2024 is still a beyond honor, that needs much recognition, because the road to your Gold Medal many will not achieve.

The connection with my husband gives me an authority to say loudly, with Demus, being a three time Gold Medalist, Demus is a United States hero, who must be admired, respected for the rest of her life and etched within our U.S. History books!

Congratulations Lashinda with receiving your 2012 GOLD Medal in Paris Olympics 2024

###

Mike Garcia “Congressman” is not Broken

  By , ,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

By  Star Moffatt, CEO & Founder / Investigative Journalist

Palmdale, CA (Moffatt Media) —

 

Reelect Mike Garcia Congressional Member-Military Veteran because Garcia is not broken.

You Smart Voters recall there is a saying “If it is NOT broken don’t try and fix it!”

As such don’t try to fix Garcia by replacing Garcia with an opposing candidate who does NOT have an established track record within Congressional District (CD) 27.   

Moffatt Media endorses Mike Garcia for the 27th Congressional District. 

Garcia has earned an established track record in representing the people-constituents and businesses (small, medium and large), in (CD) 25, since 2020-2023 and serving (CD) 27, from 2023 to present.     

Moffatt Media has also come to learn that Garcia opposes: Open Borders, Sanctuary Cities and Excessive Taxation’s.

Watch and Listen to the below reason why Moffatt Media endorses Garcia:

 

Do you know that Garcia is a Military Navy Veteran who earned the ranked: Lieutenant Commander?  Garcia, himself a pilot, was even “deployed as an F/A-18 aviator from the USS Nimitz.  … Garcia has “participated in over 30 Combat Missions,” in order to defend your freedoms against foreign enemy Terrorists? 

Garcia’s track record proves he (Garcia) can fight in combat against enemies and will continue to fight for you in Congress. 

If you love your country (USA) and Congressional District 27, is where you reside, mark your calendar to VOTE for GARCIA, on November 5, 2024, Tuesday.

Garcia fights on real life-issues affecting real life people within CD 27.

 “Reducing regulations to increase California jobs,” says Garcia. …  

Today marks Memorial Day of 05/27/2024, in “tribute to commemorate the brave men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice and never came home.  Their bravery and selflessness are the bedrock of our nation’s freedom, and it is our duty to ensure their sacrifice is never forgotten,” said Garcia.

Because Garcia will NOT stop fighting in Congress for YOU the Smart Voters.

Thank you Garcia for your ultimate sacrifice of “30 Military Combat Missions” and serving Congressional District’s: 25 and 27.

Vote on November 5, 2024, to Re-Elect Mike Garcia, Congressional Member and Veteran Hero!

###

 

Biden will “NOT” Pardon Marilyn Mosby

  By ,

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

Moffatt Media predicts that President Joe Biden will “NOT” pardon Marilyn Mosby, Former State Attorney (Prosecutor) of Baltimore, before Mosby’s Sentencing hearing on May 23, 2024,  because it’s too far out in time from the 2024 November Presidential General Election, to matter for Biden!

 

Did you know Congressman Mike Garcia gave Merrick Garland, Attorney General an “F,” Grade for Garland’s supervision of the DOJ on certain real life issues affecting real life people?

 

(DOJ) released its own Press Release regarding Mosby on Nov 9, 2023.     The Headline reads:  Former Baltimore City State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby Convicted on Two Counts of Perjury  – For Immediate Release U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Maryland

The Press Release stated in part: “A federal jury today convicted Marilyn J. Mosby, age 42, of Baltimore, Maryland, on federal charges of perjury, relating to the withdrawal of funds from the City of Baltimore’s Deferred Compensation Plan claiming that she suffered adverse financial consequences during the COVID-19 pandemic when she was Baltimore City State’s Attorney.”…

MOFFATT MEDIA RECOMMENDS

Moffatt Media recommends a Sentencing Judge use the courts discretion by setting aside Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing, that could impose Mosby in prison for 40 years.   

Beyond sad Mosby could also lose her livelihood with a revocation (disbarment) of her lawyer’s license.   Yet Mosby did NOT commit ANY violent offense and there does not appear to be a single victim.    

Moffatt Media further recommends that Mosby be treated as a First Time Nonviolent Offender and offer “Community Service in Lieu of Prison,” and that the DOJ seeks out actual violent offenders instead of targeting Mosby and other alleged American Citizen First Time Nonviolent Offenders. 

Mosby is scheduled for sentencing on May 23, 2024, Thursday, and Mosby faces 40 years in Federal Prison, because of One-Size-Fits-all, outdated Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines. 

The One-Size-Fits-all … Sentencing Guidelines is discriminatory on its face to all Americans regardless of race and “… until we value the lives, rights, and liberties of those on the receiving end of the system, “our justice system will continue to be anything but.” ~ Justice Sonia Sotomayor

Jurors found Mosby lied to take money out of her retirement account, saying she suffered COVID-related losses for her Mahogany Elite travel business, according to CBSNews.com   This logic does not hold because Mosby did not cause injury against ANY person or business.  

Mosby only committed an act against her own retirement account for an Early Withdrawal.   The financial institution overseeing  Mosby’s retirement account is mandated by law to impose an “Early Withdrawal Tax Penalty;” this action is not worth a criminal penalty seeking a 40 year stint behind bars within one of  USA’s deplorable federal prisons!

Justice Department accused of malicious prosecution

The letter accuses the Department of Justice, under former President Donald Trump, of pursuing a “meritless indictment” against Mosby and suggests that the current administration has ignored political motives behind what they call a “malicious prosecution,” cited by CBSNews.  The facts are  contrary, with an  INDICTMENT AGAINST MOSBY  filed and made public on 1/13/2022 and purported President Biden took his presidential seat on 1/20/2020, so shift blame where truly done in 2022 under Biden-Harris administration.

 

PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTION

Businesses of all sizes, including international countries were adversely affected during the COVID 19 Pandemic.   Additionally Mask Mandates were imposed by the majority of state governors  who also instituted Shelter in Place Executive Orders, which impacted nearly all businesses.  

“Mosby requested a one-time withdrawal of $40k from her City of Baltimore Employee Retirement Account.” 

Whether Mosby has been a contributing member of society before the COVID-19 May 2020 Pandemic is really an issue?  If the Judge, Court and Public answer yes to this question, wouldn’t you also agree Mosby is a First Time Nonviolent Offender, who does NOT deserve to suffer a 40 year Federal Prison sentence?

One-Size-Fits-all Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines is “oppressive” and “inhumane,” similar to third world justice, instead of  Lady Justice Balance Scales of Justice. 

Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines are facially discriminatory, and now there is a time for much reform regarding Mandatory Minimum Sentences.

 “… Vital constitutional principle must not be forgotten: Liberty requires accountability.” ~ Justice Samuel Alito.

A 40 year prison sentence against Mosby, would actually be a penalty on the Taxpayers, being forced to pay an average cost Federal Incarceration rate $43,836.00 per year to house Mosby, within a Federal Prison.   Do the math: $43.8k x 40 year sentence against Mosby, would cost Taxpayers $1.7 Million just for housing Mosby within a Federal prison facility.  Keeping in mind the $1.7 Million projected for federal prison housing against Mosby, does not include Health Care coverage, that would be available to Mosby on the inside of a Federal prison, because Mosby would be deemed federal property.

Now how much common sense does it make to impose a 40 year sentence in federal prison against Mosby, on essentially a paper crime, Nonviolent offense without any victims?  Reasonable minded Taxpayer’s are not heartless, but the USA’s criminal justice system and specifically the federal criminal justice system seems to support using prison incarceration genocide, against its own American people, to possibly include persons like Mosby.

The Eighth Amendment requires that the penalty not be egregious, and $1.7 million costs to Taxpayers just to house Mosby, within a Federal prison, is excessive and UnAmerican.

Moffatt Media recommends “Community Service in Lieu of Prison,” be the Sentence imposed against Mosby as a “First Time Nonviolent Offender.   

Any criminal Sentence imposed greater than “Community Service in Lieu of Prison,” against Mosby, would be defined as cruel and inhumane punishment, that will continue to contribute towards  Massive Incarceration and an Excessive Sentence, at a cost to the Taxpayers, for potentially housing Mosby in a federal prison.

It’s time to reform the USA’s criminal justice system, starting with removing the oppressive-discriminatory “Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines.”   

Because true American people do NOT support waste and abuse of hard earned Taxpayer dollars against ANY alleged Nonviolent Offenders, which would include Mosby. …

Contact: [email protected] CEO & Investigative Reporter

###

Tennessee lost case on Appeal regarding Fake Indictment against Connie Reguli Lawyer

  By , ,
BREAKING NEWS:
(Short Press Release)
Fake Indictment against Connie Reguli, Lawyer has been entirely reversed in Reguli’s favor.  
Today KUDOS to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee at Nashville, for doing the right thing and reversed felony convictions against Reguli!
Stay tuned for more from “Moffatt Media.”
###

“John Eastman” scholarly attorney has been investigated, charged, prosecuted and convicted by Public CORPORATION – State Bar of California

  By , ,

Public Interest Concern:  PUBLIC CORPORATION having a corporate name: The State Bar of California (SBC) has illegally investigated, charged and prosecuted Trump Adviser John Eastman.    (SBC) proceedings against Eastman have been done before an unconstitutional illegal Court. 

Eastman has been Illegally investigated, charged (administratively) and prosecuted by “CORPORATION,” State Bar of California, which is a non-governmental organization (NGO) “Public Corporation?”  

The proceedings before (SBC) are illegal and administrative proceedings only against Eastman, because (SBC) is NOT a real court of law.   The administrative proceedings are done by (SBC), which does NOT have to uphold State or Federal Constitutional laws that protect Eastman and other California Lawyer’s.

 

The California Constitution admits that the State Bar of California is only a public corporation.   See California Constitution Article 6 Section 9, which  reads in pertinent part: “[t]he State Bar of California is a Public Corporation.” … 

 

Do you know the State Bar of California has NOT been delegated STATE POLICE PROSECUTORIAL POWERS?  Only the County District Attorney’s Office usually conducts investigations to criminally charge people.  Not a “Public Corporation.”  

 

“This Court has held that delegations of regulatory power to private parties are impermissible, Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U. S. 238, 311 (1936), it held the delegation to be unconstitutional, 721 F. 3d, at 677.” 

 

There have NOT been ANY amendments to the California Constitution to allow the public corporation State Bar of California (SBC) to receive prosecutorial or court powers to be recognized as an official “Court of Record,” or a prosecutorial agency similar to a District Attorney’s Office. 

 

Shame on the State Supreme Court of California for going rogue in delegating your court powers to CORPORATION: The State Bar of California (SBC) . 

 

It’s time to take back your wrongfully delegated regulatory powers to CORPORATION (SBC) and retain both jurisdiction and regulatory powers over California Lawyer’s.  Failure by the State Supreme Court of California to take back wrongfully delegating powers outside of the California Constitution will continue to cause  imminent public safety dangers to both consumers  and California Lawyer’s. 

 

PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTION 

WHETHER  the State Bar of California,  has committed  Prosecutorial Misconduct, against Eastman?

California Bar you’re now exposed and no longer permitted to conceal from the public your legendary myth inferring to be a licensing body when in fact only a mere “Public Corporation.”

 

The State Supreme Court of California nor the State of California can delegate prosecutorial or judicial powers to ANY “Public Corporation,” because “judicial power of this State is vested in the Supreme Court, courts of appeal, and superior courts, all of which are courts of record.”

 

“[t]his Court has held that delegations of regulatory power to private parties are impermissible, Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U. S. 238, 311 (1936), it held the delegation to be unconstitutional, 721 F. 3d, at 677.   See  Department of Transportation v Association of American Railroads 575 U.S 43 2015 Amtrak

Thus, an abhorrent appearance of “Conflict of Interest” exists between the State Supreme Court of California and the State Bar of California.   The “Conflict of Interest” is problematic because it violates Constitutional Separation of Powers. 

A conflict of interest scheme causes the Supreme Court to run afoul of the Separation of Powers, with (NGO), Public Corporation State Bar of California against Eastman.

Eastman’s own attorneys will NOT challenge the abhorrent constitutional conflict of interest in violation with Separation of  Powers, between the Supreme Court and State Bar of California, are they too will find themselves DISBARRED!

To this end, the State Supreme Court of California, was the only licensing government body that issued  Eastman lawyer’s license to practice law and  hang his lawyer’s license on his wall of fame for public viewing.  

Sidebar: 

The power of history is in telling the truth:  California 2020 admits spent $134mil Voting Machines outdated beyond repair. 

 

Note areas highlighted in “purple” click on to read: supportive documents or sources of references.

###

Prosecutor “Unclean Hands” against Mark Ridley Thomas

  By , ,

Prosecutor Dirty COP “Unclean Hands” Weaponizes Indictment schemes against Mark Ridley Thomas and other American Citizens.  

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

Prosecutor (Dirty COP) Tracy Wilkison had “Unclean Hands” when she impaneled Grand Juries, filed (FAKE) criminal Indictments and targeted American Citizens:

 

  •   Mark Ridley Thomas, Former City Council Member of Los Angeles County.  Prosecutor Wilkison impaneled Grand Jury 4/1/2021, filed  (FAKE) Indictment, 10/13/2021, against Thomas.   Mark Ridgley Thomas INDICTMENT
  •  Criminal Docket # cr 2:21-cr-00485-PA  $100,000.00 alleged Bribery, Conspiracy. …  Twenty Counts

Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes “Life In Prison.”  Sentencing August 28, 2023. 

 

  • Jeff Fortenberry, Former Nebraska Congressman.  Prosecutor Wilkison impaneled Grand Jury 6/1/2021, filed (FAKE) Indictment 10/19/2021, against Fortenberry.

INDICTMENT: JEFF FORTENBERRY NEBRASA CONGRESSMAN GJ JUNE 2021

  • Criminal Docket # cr 2:21-cr-00491-SB

        $30,000.00 alleged Foreign Campaign donation received in California.   – Three counts of alleged False Statements to FBI agents.  Federal Mandatory Minimum Statutes- Sentencing 15 years in prison.  Convicted and Sentenced only two years probation with a $25,000 Fine. Fortenberry filed an Appeal, October 29, 2022.

 

  • Dr. Jeff Moffatt, Former Congressional Candidate- (Retired) Federal Attorney. Prosecutor Wilkison impaneled Grand Jury 6/1/2021, filed  (FAKE) Indictment 7/23/2021, against Moffatt. 

9/3/2021 False and Illegal Arrest against Moffatt.  Criminal Docket # cr 2:21-cr-00335-JAK-1

INDICTMENT:  GRAND JURY CRIMINAL INDICTMENT AGAINST JEFF MOFFATT JUNE 2021

        $30,000.00 SSA Disabled Attorney Fees Awarded, alleged Five Counts Wire Fraud  and one Count False Statement to SSA.  Series 1 Episode 1: Stay Tuned 

Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes – 105 years in prison.   Trial Scheduled October 24, 2023.

 

Moffatt Media has conducted Case Studies on several purported Indictments filed against American Citizens.   

Our Findings reveal that Tracy Wilkison, Prosecutor Dirty COP with “Unclean Hands” Weaponized Indictment schemes against American Citizens.  

Unless one is legally trained in Constitutional Law applicable to: (Appointment Clauses and Separation of Powers …), such (FAKE) Indictment schemes induced by Wilkison, Prosecutor-Dirty COP, would have gone unnoticed. 

 

(FAKE) Indictments against:  Thomas, Fortenberry and Moffatt:

1).  Wilkison was NOT constitutionally seated as a United States Attorney for the Central District of California, at the time when Wilkison filed the Indictments against all (3) American Citizens: Thomas, Fortenberry and Moffatt;

2).  Wilkison did NOT even affix her own signature onto ANY of the (3) (FAKE) Indictments, to make the Indictments as legally binding criminal charging documents, against all (3) American Citizens listed above;

3).  According to the United States Department of Justice, (DOJ),  even admitted in a Freedom of Information Act Request response, that Wilkison, had NOT been Appointed as a United States Attorney for the Central District of California;

4).  Wilkison when Impaneled Grand Juries and submitted the (FAKE) Indictments before the Court, against all (3) American Citizens listed above, Wilkison, had not received ANY Presidential inherent power “Nomination,” from Former President Trump or  President Biden, as a United States Attorney and Wilkison had NOT been Senate Confirmed.

5).  November 16, 2021, Merrick Garland, United States Attorney General, for DOJ, Appointed Tracy Wilkison as the Interim (Acting Officer) United States Attorney for the Central District of California. 

Wilkison filled the vacant seat that was previously held by Nicola Hanna, United States Attorney – Central District.  Hanna did receive a Presidential Nomination by Former President Trump and was Senate Confirmed, as a United States Attorney. 

6).  Wilkison even failed to indicate on the (FAKE) Indictments against all three (3) American Citizens: Thomas, Fortenberry and Moffatt, what Federal agency was her employer, having jurisdiction on the alleged Indictments; and 

7).  July 2022, Wilkison (RESIGNED) from the US DOJ and entirely from the Federal government sector.  It is suspected that Wilkison’s resignation was prompted due to violating the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1988 (Vacancies Act).  5 U.S. Code Section 3348.  …

Tracy Wilkison, Prosecutor who became a Dirty COP and committed acts of Prosecutorial Misconduct, developed schemes to undermine our criminal justice system.   

Wilkison conspired and targeted American Citizens by filing (FAKE)  fraudulent Indictments into the United States District Court – Central District of California.   

Keeping in mind, not one of the above listed three (3) American Citizens have committed ANY violent offenses against the United States of America or violent offenses against ANY persons defined as victims.    

Consequently, the Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes of One-Size-Fits-All, lopsided Federal laws, all three (3) American Citizens, are facing a two-tiered unequal justice system, that will significantly adversely impact their lives, with the loss of livelihoods, costly college degrees down the toilets, loss of life, liberty and freedoms on alleged non-violent offenses and (FAKE) Indictments, how UnAmerican. 

Even all three (3) American Citizens, their families, friends and supporters’ lives they too will be shattered unless the (FAKE) INDICTMENTS are promptly investigated and summarily dismissed by the United States District Court – Central District of California, because Wilkison was NOT constitutionally seated, and committed illegal Indictment schemes not in accordance with Federal laws.  

PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTION

Did you know Federal District Court Judge’s hands are usually tied when Sentencing under Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes?

To this end, unless United We Stand against the Unconstitutional (FAKE) Fraudulent Indictments against all three (3) American Citizens, listed above, they will face unjust Court Lynchings, by the United States of America, based on Wilkison Prosecutor- Dirty COP, (FAKE) Indictments and Grand Jury Schemes.

Alert:  You could be next facing a (FAKE) Indictment, because Weaponization against American Citizens does not discriminate!  

Share this Real Talk- Real Fact Story, in front of three (3) persuadable people that you know, because it’s NOT about whether one is Republican or Democrat, it is about doing the right thing to expose unjust and lopsided  Federal laws in America. 

It is also about exposing Tracy Wilkison, United States Department of Justice (DOJ) Dirty COP, who has stained the fabric of good COP’s!

###