• Moffatt Media America's Taxpayer Watchdog News

Tag: Rachel Alexander

Rachel Alexander predicted “Sidney Powell” Attorney Target

  By

By  Star Moffatt, CEO & Founder/

Investigative Journalist

Palmdale, CA (Moffatt Media) —

Ep1

 

Do you know Rachel Alexander on (9-18-2021), predicted Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani would be next Conservative Attorneys politically targeted? 

“Alexander,” made her prediction in 2021, that Powell and Giuliani would become politically targeted.

 

Alexander used her investigative reporting skills and intuitiveness to make her predictions about Powell and Giuliani.

 

For those of you that didn’t catch the historic article read at:  2021 Article  by Alexander. Novice readers, click on the highlighted purple area to retrieve the referenced article.

 

Fellow conservatives members of the Republican Party, it appears Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), Leftist Congressional Member, kept her promise to create lists specifically targeting Conservatives, like: Powell, Giuliani, Moffatt and many others.

 

For verification of (AOC) creating a list to target Conservatives, recall The New American, reported on (11/7/2020), that (AOC) Congressional Rep, said: “Voices on the Left including herself are calling for lists to be kept of Trump supporters so they can be ostracized and otherwise punished.”…

 

(AOC) creating a list specifically targeting Conservatives and especially those Conservatives supportive to Trump, AOC’s list smells of the days of Herbert Hoover’s target list and McCarthyism.

 

Other targeting lists consist of parents who speak out at school board meetings  asking for accountability and transparency and Conservative Attorneys who litigate Election cases.   

 

Conservative Attorneys under target are facing disbarments, with loss of their financial livelihoods, careers wiped out and families shattered!

 

PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTION

Why hasn’t Congress conducted a Congressional Investigation into AOC’s induced targeting schemes against certain groups of people defined as Conservative Attorneys with political affiliations of the Republican Party?

 

Surely Conservatives agree we are born American’s first before any political party affiliation.  Because belonging to ANY specific political party does not define one’s character of being. Example Alexander’s (2021) shocking prediction Article.

 

“President Trump” when re-elected and installed on January 20, 2025, we might start having some accountability regarding the targeting of Conservatives and Conservative Attorneys.

###

Abe Hamadeh’s request for New Trial denied by “TERMED OUT” Arizona Judge Lee F. Jantzen

  By

(Short Press Release)

Did you know that purported Judge Lee F. Jantzen is NOT constitutionally seated?  Jantzen TERMED OUT 2019.

Decisions and Orders issued by Judge Jantzen in the matter of Abe Hamadeh’s Election Contest are INVALID.

Moffatt Media’s Findings reveal Jan Brewer, Governor in 2009 was the first and last governor to Appoint Jantzen.

Jantzen did win his judicial seat unopposed in years: 2010 and 2014.

But Decisions and Orders issued now by Jantzen in Abe Hamadeh’s Election Contest are NOT VALID.  For these reasons should grant Hamadeh with a New Trial as requested and reassignment with a judge that is constitutionally seated.

Jantzen TERMED OUT means Jantzen is also operating from the bench on an expired “Loyalty Oath of Office.”  TERMED OUT and without a valid Loyalty Oath Decisions and orders are completely void.

 

MAJOR PROBLEM
Attorney’s for Hamadeh more than likely will NOT raise the issue that purported Judge Jantzen is not constitutionally seated on the Mohave County Superior Court.

Even decisions and orders issued by Jantzen will probably NOT be constitutionally challenged as Void Ab Initio, because Attorney’s for Hamadeh, they too are defined as Court Officers.

Attorney’s also known as Court Officers especially in Arizona have lost their First Amendment Freedom of Speech Constitutional Protective Rights and if they advocate too much for their clients, will find themselves being disbarred, loss of their livelihoods and criminally charged sui generis by Union NGO Non-profit Corporation, that has been wrongfully delegated state prosecutorial and investigatory law enforcement powers.

 

SOLUTION
Arizonians supporting Hamadeh “Take Action Now” by submitting Demand Letters to the Arizona House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, to remove purported Judge Jantzen.  

Along with Demand intervention by the Judiciary Committee to implement a New Trial for Hamadeh, since purported Judge Jantzen is illegally seated since 2019. 

###

 

Dismantle the State Bar of Arizona – “Suspend” Supreme Court Rule 32

  By , ,

“Moffatt Media,” supports in part to Dismantle the State Bar of Arizona under Senate Bill 1435 (SB 1435).   “Moffatt Media,” also recommends that (SB 1435), be in Tribute to Lisa Aubuchon, Rachel Alexander & Andrew Thomas … because they have been constitutionally impacted by the Supreme Court of Arizona and private nonprofit corporation Arizona Bar.   

Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas were retaliated against for doing the right thing to investigate Maricopa County Arizona (Phoenix), $340 Mil (South Court Tower), Courthouse, that should have not escaped Voter Approval.  

“Moffatt Media,” supports (SB1435) in pertinent part at: Section 7, 12-119.06 “Attorney Licensing Requirements  … The supreme court may not require an attorney to be a member of any organization to become or remain a licensed attorney in this state.”  Bold for emphasis. 

Conflicts:  The Supreme Court mandates that attorneys become Members within the State Bar of Arizona, conflicts because:   (1) Arizona is a “Right to Work State.” See Arizona Constitution Article XXV (25) Section 0 and (2) In Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018), landmark case of the  United States Supreme Court, recognized mandatory union dues violated constitutional First Amendment right to free speech.   

Supreme Court Rule 32(1): “Practice of law. Every person licensed by this Court to engage in the practice of law must be a member of the State Bar of Arizona in accordance with these rules.”

Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1) mandatory membership is unconstitutional and illegal and must be Suspended inclusive in (SB 1435). 

Yet to this present date, the ​Supreme Court of Arizona continues to give in Don Bongino fashion, a “double barrel middle finger” towards the Arizona Legislatures, by refusing to reform, restore and implement First Amendment Protections.  

RECOMMENDATIONS 

Any continued refusal by the Supreme Court of Arizona,  NOT to reform, restore, implement and uphold State and Federal First Amendment constitutional laws, that apply to all people, including Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas and other Arizona Lawyers, then it’s time to call upon the Federal Government for intervention.  

Any continued refusal by the Supreme Court of Arizona,  NOT to Suspend Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1) Mandatory Membership, then legislatures must move for Articles of Impeachment against Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona for: public corruption, incompetency, neglect of duty while in their capacity as Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona.  Remember no one is above the law including Judges-Justices of the Arizona Supreme Court. 

Any continued failure to remove Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1), Mandatory Membership, in light of the Supreme Court case in  Janus v. AFSCME, is a “systemic structural implosion,” regulating attorneys. Continued failures by the Arizona Supreme Court not to uphold constitutional protections, the Federal Funds issued to the State of Arizona, should be Sanctioned for constitutional violations, along with disgorging Supreme Court Justices salaries.  

Since turning a blind eye to constitutional violations have adversely impacted ALL THREE: Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas … is illegal,  unconstitutional and needs immediate ratification into (SB 1435).  Extending legislative language into (SB 1435), would not be a difficult process to supplement.  

(SB 1435) should also be amended to state that Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas’ convictions were illegal, unconstitutional and subsequently null and void, under  Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 32(1), mandatory membership.

Conclusive findings do exist with good cause to Reinstate All Three:  Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas …  it’s time! 

For all the foregoing reasons stated above “Moffatt Media,” supports (SB1435) in pertinent  part, that: “The supreme court may not require an attorney to be a member of any organization to become or remain a licensed attorney in this state.”  …

###

 

Arizona Supreme Court make your Wrong a Right

  By ,

Arizona Supreme Court: Your Wrong, time to make Right.  Remove the Excessive Sanction against Rachel Alexander, Lisa Aubuchon, Andrew Thomas and Reinstate their Arizona Attorneys license it’s time!

Findings reveal the Arizona Supreme Court has weaponized and imposed a $101,292.75 sanctioned against Rachel Alexander, Lisa Aubuchon and Andrew Thomas. The sanction was imposed under Supreme Court Rule 60(b).  

Moffatt Media urges reversal of the $101k+ sanction (fine), because it violates the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution related to “excessive fines,” among other issues.

Surprisingly the Supreme Court’s weaponization began by abusing its power with creating and also imposing administrative Supreme Court Rule 51, de facto law.  

Rule 51 intentionally created another Supreme Court Judge-Justice Seat in conflict with Arizona’s Constitution for Judicial Appointments.  Remember Courts don’t create laws, they interpret and decide laws!

More importantly, Supreme Court Rule 51,  has NEVER  been approved by ANY Arizona Governor, Arizona Legislators nor adopted into law.  Rule 51 continues to be weaponized against Alexander, Aubuchon, Thomas, Arizona Lawyers and other persons.

Essentially the Supreme Court of  Arizona has committed Prosecutorial Misconduct, by inducing Rule 51 weaponization schemes in the form of  “Canceling Out,” First Amendment Protections against All3: (Alexander, Aubuchon & Thomas).  …

Keeping in mind, no state including Arizona, can modify the Bill of Rights First Amendment Constitutional Protections without Two-Thirds Members of Congress or Two-Thirds Arizona Legislatures.  

But the Arizona Judiciary Legislatures did attempt to do the right thing and recommended that the A​rizona Supreme Court ​implement First Amendment Protections.   

However, the ​Supreme Court of Arizona continues to give a “double barrel middle finger” to the Arizona Judiciary Legislatures, by refusing to implement (restore)  First Amendment Protections. 

The failure by the Supreme Court of Arizona not to uphold and (restore) First Amendment Protections does in fact have a chilling adverse impact on Free Speech.

Consequently, maybe it’s time the Federal Government intervenes and impose Sanctions on the State of ​Arizona and ​the State Supreme Court of Arizona, for intentionally removing First Amendment Protections against All3: Alexander, Aubuchon & Thomas … 

“No matter what defense motions we submitted, no matter what evidence we submitted each and every single piece of defense evidence and discovery offered, were all “DENIED” by the Court.” ~ Rachel Alexander 

Moffatt Media’s Recommendation: 

The Supreme Court’s excessive Sanctions against Alexander Aubuchon Thomas masked as: Costs and Expenses should be removed, because they did the right thing to investigate Maricopa County Arizona (Phoenix), $340 Mil (South Court Tower), Courthouse, that should have not escaped Voter Approval. 

###

Reinstate ALL3​ Rachel Alexander, Lisa Aubuchon – Andrew Thomas

  By ,
​“David Stringer arrested in 1983 paying teens for sex.” …  says KTAR NEWS.
     Since Baltimore ​Child Pedophile (David Stringer) is able to  retain​​ his Arizona Lawyer’s license, surely there is no reason NOT to REINSTATE ALL3:  Rachel Alexander, Lisa  Aubuchon & Andrew Thomas​, just to name a few.
​

    Arizona remove the excessive cruel and unusual $101,000.00 illegal Sanction (Fine) imposed against All3 and REINSTATE All3: Rachel Alexander, Lisa Aubuchon and Andrew Thomas Lawyer’s License. Recommendation by Moffatt Media.

###