By Star Moffatt, CEO & Founder / Investigative Journalist
Palmdale, CA (Moffatt Media) —
Reelect Mike Garcia Congressional Member-Military Veteran because Garcia is not broken.
You Smart Voters recall there is a saying “If it is NOT broken don’t try and fix it!”
As such don’t try to fix Garcia by replacing Garcia with an opposing candidate who does NOT have an established track record within Congressional District (CD) 27.
Moffatt Media endorses Mike Garcia for the 27th Congressional District.
Garcia has earned an established track record in representing the people-constituents and businesses (small, medium and large), in (CD) 25, since 2020-2023 and serving (CD) 27, from 2023 to present.
Moffatt Media has also come to learn that Garcia opposes: Open Borders, Sanctuary Cities and Excessive Taxation’s.
Watch and Listen to the below reason why Moffatt Media endorses Garcia:
Do you know that Garcia is a Military Navy Veteran who earned the ranked: Lieutenant Commander? Garcia, himself a pilot, was even “deployed as an F/A-18 aviator from the USS Nimitz. … Garcia has “participated in over 30 Combat Missions,” in order to defend your freedoms against foreign enemy Terrorists?
Garcia’s track record proves he (Garcia) can fight in combat against enemies and will continue to fight for you in Congress.
If you love your country (USA) and Congressional District 27, is where you reside, mark your calendar to VOTE for GARCIA, on November 5, 2024, Tuesday.
Garcia fights on real life-issues affecting real life people within CD 27.
“Reducing regulations to increase California jobs,” says Garcia. …
Today marks Memorial Day of 05/27/2024, in “tribute to commemorate the brave men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice and never came home. Their bravery and selflessness are the bedrock of our nation’s freedom, and it is our duty to ensure their sacrifice is never forgotten,” said Garcia.
Because Garcia will NOT stop fighting in Congress for YOU the Smart Voters.
Thank you Garcia for your ultimate sacrifice of “30 Military Combat Missions” and serving Congressional District’s: 25 and 27.
Vote on November 5, 2024, to Re-Elect Mike Garcia, Congressional Member and Veteran Hero!
Moffatt Media predicts that President Joe Biden will “NOT” pardon Marilyn Mosby, Former State Attorney (Prosecutor) of Baltimore, before Mosby’s Sentencing hearing on May 23, 2024, because it’s too far out in time from the 2024 November Presidential General Election, to matter for Biden!
Did you know Congressman Mike Garcia gave Merrick Garland, Attorney General an “F,” Grade for Garland’s supervision of the DOJ on certain real life issues affecting real life people?
(DOJ) released its own Press Release regarding Mosby on Nov 9, 2023. The Headline reads: Former Baltimore City State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby Convicted on Two Counts of Perjury – For Immediate Release U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Maryland
The Press Release stated in part: “A federal jury today convicted Marilyn J. Mosby, age 42, of Baltimore, Maryland, on federal charges of perjury, relating to the withdrawal of funds from the City of Baltimore’s Deferred Compensation Plan claiming that she suffered adverse financial consequences during the COVID-19 pandemic when she was Baltimore City State’s Attorney.”…
MOFFATT MEDIA RECOMMENDS
Moffatt Media recommends a Sentencing Judge use the courts discretion by setting aside Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing, that could impose Mosby in prison for 40 years.
Beyond sad Mosby could also lose her livelihood with a revocation (disbarment) of her lawyer’s license. Yet Mosby did NOT commit ANY violent offense and there does not appear to be a single victim.
Moffatt Media further recommends that Mosby be treated as a First Time Nonviolent Offender and offer “Community Service in Lieu of Prison,” and that the DOJ seeks out actual violent offenders instead of targeting Mosby and other alleged American Citizen First Time Nonviolent Offenders.
Mosby is scheduled for sentencing on May 23, 2024, Thursday, and Mosby faces 40 years in Federal Prison, because of One-Size-Fits-all, outdated Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines.
The One-Size-Fits-all … Sentencing Guidelines is discriminatory on its face to all Americans regardless of race and “… until we value the lives, rights, and liberties of those on the receiving end of the system, “our justice system will continue to be anything but.” ~ Justice Sonia Sotomayor
Jurors found Mosby lied to take money out of her retirement account, saying she suffered COVID-related losses for her Mahogany Elite travel business, according to CBSNews.com This logic does not hold because Mosby did not cause injury against ANY person or business.
Mosby only committed an act against her own retirement account for an Early Withdrawal. The financial institution overseeing Mosby’s retirement account is mandated by law to impose an “Early Withdrawal Tax Penalty;” this action is not worth a criminal penalty seeking a 40 year stint behind bars within one of USA’s deplorable federal prisons!
Justice Department accused of malicious prosecution
The letter accuses the Department of Justice, under former President Donald Trump, of pursuing a “meritless indictment” against Mosby and suggests that the current administration has ignored political motives behind what they call a “malicious prosecution,” cited by CBSNews. The facts are contrary, with an INDICTMENT AGAINST MOSBY filed and made public on 1/13/2022 and purported President Biden took his presidential seat on 1/20/2020, so shift blame where truly done in 2022 under Biden-Harris administration.
PUBLIC INTEREST CONCERN QUESTION
Businesses of all sizes, including international countries were adversely affected during the COVID 19 Pandemic. Additionally Mask Mandates were imposed by the majority of state governors who also instituted Shelter in Place Executive Orders, which impacted nearly all businesses.
“Mosby requested a one-time withdrawal of $40k from her City of Baltimore Employee Retirement Account.”
Whether Mosby has been a contributing member of society before the COVID-19 May 2020 Pandemic is really an issue? If the Judge, Court and Public answer yes to this question, wouldn’t you also agree Mosby is a First Time Nonviolent Offender, who does NOT deserve to suffer a 40 year Federal Prison sentence?
One-Size-Fits-all Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines is “oppressive” and “inhumane,” similar to third world justice, instead of Lady Justice Balance Scales of Justice.
Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines are facially discriminatory, and now there is a time for much reform regarding Mandatory Minimum Sentences.
“… Vital constitutional principle must not be forgotten: Liberty requires accountability.” ~ Justice Samuel Alito.
A 40 year prison sentence against Mosby, would actually be a penalty on the Taxpayers, being forced to pay an average cost Federal Incarceration rate $43,836.00per year to house Mosby, within a Federal Prison. Do the math:$43.8k x 40 year sentence against Mosby, would cost Taxpayers $1.7 Million just for housing Mosby within a Federal prison facility. Keeping in mind the $1.7 Million projected for federal prison housing against Mosby, does not include Health Care coverage, that would be available to Mosby on the inside of a Federal prison, because Mosby would be deemed federal property.
Now how much common sense does it make to impose a 40 year sentence in federal prison against Mosby, on essentially a paper crime, Nonviolent offense without any victims? Reasonable minded Taxpayer’s are not heartless, but the USA’s criminal justice system and specifically the federal criminal justice system seems to support using prison incarceration genocide, against its own American people, to possibly include persons like Mosby.
The Eighth Amendment requires that the penalty not be egregious, and $1.7 million costs to Taxpayers just to house Mosby, within a Federal prison, is excessive and UnAmerican.
Moffatt Media recommends “Community Service in Lieu of Prison,” be the Sentence imposed against Mosby as a “First Time Nonviolent Offender.
Any criminal Sentence imposed greater than “Community Service in Lieu of Prison,” against Mosby, would be defined as cruel and inhumane punishment, that will continue to contribute towards Massive Incarceration and an Excessive Sentence, at a cost to the Taxpayers, for potentially housing Mosby in a federal prison.
It’s time to reform the USA’s criminal justice system, starting with removing the oppressive-discriminatory “Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines.”
Because true American people do NOT support waste and abuse of hard earned Taxpayer dollars against ANY alleged Nonviolent Offenders, which would include Mosby. …
By: Star Moffatt, CEO of Moffatt Media (Investigative Journalist & Eye Witness)
Caught on video “Verbal & Mental” abuse induced by Claire Rogerson, “Federal Public Defender,” against alleged criminal Defendant Jeffrey Dean Moffatt, Ret. Federal Attorney and Former (2016) Congressional Candidate.
Click on the arrow below to hear audio 12/12/2023, 3:18pm converted from video, which is now being republished on my PR Media Company Moffatt Media’s own platform, because YouTube ‘censored’ (removed) the Video and content on 4/6/2024:
(Episode 1)
QUESTION PRESENTED:A four month rookie assigned to defend high profile case of a 20 year Federal Attorney. The question of the year, why would the Federal Public Defender’s Office assign an unskilled attorney to represent a seasoned 20 year Federal attorney?
Newbie (Rookie) Rogerson only licensed to practice California law from 7/13/2023 and was assigned to Moffatt’s case 11/2023. Yet the United States Supreme Court has made it very clear that any alleged criminal defendant must create a record at trial court level “Ineffective Assistance of Counsel,” in order for the Supreme Court to consider accepting a case for review.
See Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez, Docket #20-1009, which mandates that deficiencies of counsel must make the record at trial court level. 5/23/2022 Justice Sotomayor, gave a Dissenting Opinion in Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez, said in part: “…the Court leaps to the conclusion that a petitioner is at fault for not developing the evidentiary record on a trial-ineffectiveness claim even if that lack of development.” … to essentially mean that a Defendant must know the law better than the attorney.
Learning of Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez, my eyes have witnessed since 9/3/2021 to present April 2024, Newbie (Rookie) Rogerson, Public Defender #2 and prior Ramanujan Deskin Nadadur aka Anuj Nadadur, Public Defender #1, rolled over on Moffatt, ie … my beloved husband Jeff of 33 years. Neither Rogerson or Nadadur, would NOT do one procedural substantial thing Jeff would ask.
Essentially (Rogerson & Nadadur) have been setting my husband up to be railroaded on alleged non-violent offense without any victims and subjecting my husband with facing 105 years in Federal prison on statutes themselves, which raise constitutional challenges. What qualifies me to say such: I am also a Certified Paralegal since 1999, co-owner of a law firm, past lead Plaintiff in two major government cases, I have completed my First Year in Law and I have two College Degrees.
Back to what my eyes witnessed: misconduct by Rogerson and Nadadur, they would NOT even submit one shred of Jeff’s own evidence, that included two Forensic Expert Reports onto the government’s supposed counsel.
Since 9/2021 through 4/2024, (Rogerson & Nadadur) would NOT even submit ANY Pretrial Motions into the Court, with a simple Motion to Dismiss, because the court lacks jurisdiction on the alleged Grand Jury Indictment, that was filed 5 years and 3 months past the Statute of Limitations on 7/23/2021. So yes, I have no problem admitting to doing the audio-video recording on Rogerson, because (Rogerson & Nadadur), were obviously rolling over and doing stand-downs against my husband Jeff.
Additionally, I admit to doing the recordings without Rogerson’ consent because of fear in protecting my husband’s safety from being illegally arrested (kidnapped) again, and potentially wrongfully convicted.
They (Rogerson & Nadadur) pushed my back up against the wall, to help protect my beloved husband Jeff’s American constitutional rights and gather evidence in creating a public record for trial court level as mandated in Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez, U.S. Supreme Court Docket#20-1009. Briefly, in Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez, two Arizona convicted prisoners on Death Row: David Martinez Ramirez and Barry Lee Jones, were seeking post conviction remedies, to prove: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, but Ramirez and Jones were still executed in Arizona.
When the “Shoes of Injustices,” are being faced similarly in Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez and my husband is facing 105 years in federal prison, which is essentially a Death Sentence, on a bogus Indictment and illegal arrest, wouldn’t you do the same thing to protect your own family members freedoms, even if meant to video or record a conversation, regardless if one is a Federal Public Defender?
(Rogerson & Nadadur’s) actions against my husband Jeff, have been intentional unethical conduct by failing NOT to uphold his guaranteed Sixth Amendment and Equal Constitutional Protections, that have been placing my husband at risk of being wrongfully convicted of 105 years in federal prison on alleged non-violent offenses. Enough is enough with intentionally depriving my husband of his constitutional protections for nearly 3 years.
Again one reason for recording Rogerson was to assist my husband (Jeff) in gathering evidence at the trial court record of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, based on Shinn v. Ramirez, among other issues.
Normally I do not make it a practice to share our own Life Bumps, on Moffatt Media’s social media platform, but it is time and much overdue in time!
Since my eyes have witnessed three incidents of Verbal & Mental abuse by Rogerson, Federal Public Defender against my husband Jeffrey Moffatt, Fed Retired Federal Attorney, an alleged criminal defendant. It wasn’t until the third call that I recorded Rogerson. I had enough listening to how Rogerson, Rookie (Newbie) was verbally abusing my husband over the telephone.
My beloved husband of 33 years, an alleged criminal defendant in Federal Court is facing 105 years in federal prison on a bogus Grand Jury Indictment that alleges 5 Counts of Wire fraud at $30k and 1 Count of False Statement. The bogus Indictment was filed against my husband 7/23/2021, he (Jeff) was illegally arrested 9/3/2021, never received any Summons or simple telephone call to advise him, that he had been Indicted on 7/23/2021.
Get this, government Prosecutors had to conceal material facts from the Grand Jury, because if the (Jurors) had been shown evidence that $30k was on actually attorney fees earned and approved by five Judges, there is no way in the world ANY Juror, would have returned a Federal Felony Indictment, against my husband. The government (Prosecutors) also had to conceal from the (Jurors), an open Federal Appeal that has existed in another court prior to the Indictment, on the same issues since 6/19/2020 and that several recent U.S. Supreme Court cases vindicate my Husband.
MY OPINION
Rogerson, I am calling on you to Resign or be Fired from the Public Defender’s Office for failing to uphold Federal Sixth Amendment Constitutional protections and among other constitutional protections for the benefit of my husband (Jeff). Why: You’re a disgrace to the Federal Public Defender’s Office!
It is beyond belief that you (Rogerson) couldn’t even do four simple things from the time assigned on Jeff’s case back in November 2023 through 4/4/2024, until you resigned from Jeff’s case 4/5/2024.
Four simple request by alleged Defendant Jeff Moffatt were as follows:
1). Provided a Certified copy of Grand Jury Transcripts;
2). File a Pretrial Motion (Motion to Stay), since open Appeal in another Federal Court since 6/19/2020;
3). Submit a Motion for Bail Modification, because one Bail condition conflicts with the Bail Reform Act;
4). Provide “Certified Copies” of Arrest Warrants: Doc 3 issued 7/23/2021 and Doc 17 issued 9/3/2021;
Above four requests Jeff has been asking for since 2021, from Public Defender#1 Nadadur who also resigned from the alleged Indictment case against Jeff.
Court of Pubic Opinion Comments:
Beyond grateful that many True Americans took the time out of their busy day and reviewed the Video-Audio of Verbal & Mental Abuse induced by Rogerson against my (hubby) and here are a few of many Public Opinion comments:
“She is a real piece of work! Nice she admits that she doesn’t have time to work on his case, (not important to her!) until January, yet wont file for continuance past May! This is really a horror show at Jeff’s expense sorry to say.” – Lori
“I would be dumping that public pretender. Jeff should be mentoring these newbie public pretenders and getting paid for it!” – Aron
“Wow I can hear the frustration and Jeff’s voice, but he handled himself very well and I understand what hes trying to say by saying that they should use her inexperience to his advantage but she seems to be too prideful to want to do that. What a nightmare. She should be taking advantage of his experience not working against it.” – Kathy
This sounds like it has something to do with race & wealth! Black folks have been stripped of their Generational wealth ever since I could remember. Just think back when we as a people thrived during the times of Black Wall Street. Once the courts and guardians spend or force you to spend up your wealth defending yourself you are left with nothing, which is all to be designed.
The system may see Jeff guilty by association to whom he is married to Star Moffatt, a Black Woman. It’s not hard to believe racists practices still goes on in today’s society. Too bad those same corrupt officials can’t be arrested and put on trial for their seemingly racist antics and old school mentality. Times have changed but not much. Black folks continue to have to work twice as hard giving 100% of themselves while they can get by and shine with 10% . I’m going to continue to follow this saga and hopefully the system recognizes that it is truly broken and being indifferent to Jeffrey Moffatt, his wife Star and their entire family. – Annie Mae
“They need to throw that bogus nonsense out!” – Maria
Conclusion:
True American friends and family, the above is how you document “Ineffective Assistance of Counsel,” along with hiring a PR Media Company like Moffatt Media, to assist in gathering and preserving evidence for you or your loved ones, to protect one’s safety & freedoms!
Now to you Rogerson, congratulations you are now a textbook case of what a Rookie (Newbie) should NOT do straight out of law school.
Remember, as of 4/5/2024 Rogerson is asking the court to come off the case and the entire Federal Defenders office, as a direct result of the videos due to the outpouring support by True American’s not afraid to speak up and out on: X formerly Twitter and YouTube.
Our gratitude extends also to the other True Americans that have shown support by sending emails, text and your many phone calls.
The same appreciation if you have read thus far, in hearing our own temporary “Life Bump Story,” knowing that GOD is almighty and GOD will intercede on his timing, to expose the truth behind why my husband is wearing “Shoes of Injustice.”
Finally note, and now imagine if the above can happen to a 20 year Federal Attorney and too mean my husband, can you imagine what happens to alleged defendants that are not legally trained and do not know their rights?
It has become a sad day in the proud (USA) when murderers have more constitutional protections than Lawyers. ~ Star Moffatt
Proud (USA) what a shame that you give Murder’s access to equal justice, yet trample on the constitutional rights and equal protections of a certain group of people whose lives also matter: Lawyer’s.
(USA) you turn a blind eye by allowing certain State Supreme Courts to delegate court prosecutorial powers to corporations. Those same corporations then operate past their jurisdictions, authorities, Mission Statements, Articles and By-Laws.
The State Supreme Courts delegate court prosecutorial powers to corporations that investigate, criminally charge and prosecute Lawyer’s with using administrative judges and sui generis proceedings (make it up as you go), without affording Lawyer’s Civil or Criminal jurisdictional “Jury Trials within Courts of Record, among their peers! “ Consequently, denying lawful judgment before one’s peers, under the Seventh Amendment Constitution.
These same corporations have a pattern and practice NOT to uphold State or Federal Constitutional laws, because they often out rightly ignore constitutional challenges when confronted.
Moffatt Media Recommends
Congressional inquiries begin against the State Supreme Court of Arizona and the State Supreme Court of California, for failing to uphold Separation of Powers … by delegating court prosecutorial powers to Corporations to regulate, investigate, charge and prosecute (discipline) Lawyers by corporate entities State Bar of Arizona and the State Bar of California.
See Supreme Court of Arizona Court Rule 32 (2)(D). The State Bar of Arizona “is both investigator and prosecutor.” … said John Phelps, CEO and Executive Director, State Bar of Arizona, source: The Arizona Republic.
States such as California and Arizona, have notmodified their State Constitutions, to delegate prosecutorial powers to the State Bar of Arizona and the State Bar of California. The failure to modify State Constitutions makes it unconstitutional and illegal, for delegating prosecutorial powers to ANY corporations including the State Bar of California and the State Bar of Arizona.
Hence corporations State Bar of Arizona and State Bar of California, do not uphold First & Seventh Amendment constitutional protections applicable to a certain group of people too mean: Lawyers, who are Protected Class Members defined: Disabled, “particular race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), or national origin,” and Older American Lawyers.
Corporations like the State Bar of Arizona and State Bar of California, only look out for the interest of alignment with State Supreme Courts and their own policy guideline Ethical Rules.
Injustices not to preserve upholding constitutional rights and equal protections, kills off law degrees, to become worthless, which are already exacerbated in existing inequalities within the labor industry of Lawyers.
Corporate entityState Bar of Arizona, provided the murder weapon and proceeded to fatally “kill” my forty year legal career, while denying my constitutional rights, says: Tony Guajardo.
The injustice against Tony Guajardo is now a norm to fatally kill and wipe out a Lawyer’s seasoned career without offering ANY diversion solutions, which would preserve upholding constitutional rights and equal protections to alleged first time non-violent offenders.
Guajardo Disabled Vietnam Veteran, Former Assistant Attorney General of Texas, Former Counsel with the United States Supreme Court, Administrative Law Judge, Senior Trial Attorney with the EEOC, Federal Bar Association President, Bexar County Criminal District Attorney, Staff Attorney with the Gulf Coast Legal Foundation and Former Arizona Lawyer.
Tribute to Tony Guajardo: J.D.M, Rachel Alexander, Lisa Aubuchon, Andrew Thomas, Dr. Jane Ross, John Eastman, Jeff Clark, Kurt Olsen, Bryan Blehm, Connie Reguli and other fallen Lawyers who have spoken up and out, exposing government public corruption!
Whether “Third World Justice” undermines equal access to justice against April Sponsel, Former Maricopa County Prosecutor?
A Decision and Order Imposing Sanctions, with two year Suspension, was filed against Sponsel’s law license on 12/19/2023 by the Arizona Supreme Court Hearing Panel. The Hearing Panel, which is NOT in compliance with the Arizona Constitution.
Whether the Hearing Panel has exceeded jurisdiction and authority against Sponsel and other Arizona Lawyer’s?
The Hearing Panel was created under Arizona State Supreme Court Rule 52, Administrative Order No.: 2010-136, dated: 12/22/2010, issued by former Chief Justice Rebecca White Berch. “A three-person hearing board consisting of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, a volunteer, lawyer and a public member will hear any cases proceeding to hearing. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and the hearing boards will have the authority to impose all sanctions including disbarment,” said Berch.
Berch proceeded in 2010, with creating the Hearing Panel in Administrative Order# 2010-136, knowing such panel lacks constitutional infrastructure compliance.
Essentially the Hearing Panel operating under Administrative Order 2010-136, creates an administrative fourth branch of judiciary government without approval by ANY Governor or Arizona House of Representatives Judiciary Committee.
MOFFATT MEDIA’S RECOMMENDATION ON SUPREME COURT RULE 52
Suspend Supreme Court Rule 52, until there has been a constitutional review to determine Rule 52, contingent on constitutionally legally valid and does not conflict with the Arizona Constitution; and
Suspend Supreme Court Rule 52, that gives the Hearing Panel, a murder weapon to fatally “kill” Sponsel and other Arizona Lawyer’s professional occupational Lawyer’s licenses and their financial livelihoods.
The “Decision and Order Imposing Sanctions,” filed: 12/19/2023, against April Sponsel reads in pertinent part: “The hearing panel was comprised ofPresiding Disciplinary Judge Margaret H. Downie, attorney member Mark S. Sifferman, and public member Randall Clark.”
Sponsel was prosecuted by the Hearing Panel under Count Two alleged violation of ER 1.1. and ER to mean: (Ethical Rule). Do you know the Ethical Rules, are NOT adopted into any Arizona statutory civil or criminal laws?
Conclusion paragraph within the “Decision and Order Imposing Sanctions,” reads in pertinent part: … “April Arlene Sponsel is suspended from the practice of law in Arizona for two years.” …
A two year suspension has the same effect as a disbarment and taking of Sponsel’s vested law license.
Thetaking of Sponsel’s law license and livelihood has NOT been done by a real “Court of Record,” because the Hearing Panel is nothing more than an administrative hearing body, that does NOT uphold State or Federal constitutional laws.
Do you know the administrative Hearing Panel proceedings against Sponsel denied Sponsel a Jury Trial?
Do you know Sponsel and other Arizona Lawyer’s do NOT have First Amendment Protections?
Because the Arizona legislative Judiciary Branch of government has not been able to force the Supreme Court of Arizona into compliance with implementing First Amendment protections for Sponsel and Arizona Lawyer’s.
ER to mean Ethical Rules
The Ethical Rules are only policy guidelines of Non-Profit Corporation doing business as: State Bar of Arizona. All proceedings are nothing more than sui generis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 48(a) and administrative.
Arizona Supreme Court, enough is enough STOPthe kangaroo unconstitutional proceedings against Arizona Lawyer’s.
The Hearing Panel’s Infrastructure has been unconstitutional since its inception.
WHY:
Courts, including the State Supreme Court of Arizona, do NOT make laws they interpret and decide laws!
____
Moffatt Media, has been conducting Case Studies since 2015, regarding the State Bar of Arizona, the Hearing Panel and the State Supreme Court of Arizona.
It continues to be unfortunate that the Arizona Supreme Court appears to have gone rogue against persons like Sponsel and other Arizona Lawyer’s.
Maybe it’s time for Congress to conduct Congressional Inquiries against the Arizona Supreme Court, Hearing Panel and including Supreme Court Rule 52.
Novice users click on areas highlighted in purple to view supportive documents or other references.
###
About Investigative Journalist
Star Moffatt, CEO & Founder of Moffatt Media, Investigative Journalist, Certified Paralegal. Lead Paralegal in two U.S. Supreme Court cases and Completed First Year of Law School.
“County elections officials must now implement a voting system that meets the state’s newest testing and certification standards in time for the March 3, 2020 Presidential Primary Election,” per Secretary of State Alex Padilla, February 27, 2019. …
“Throughout California, many counties are using voting systems that are at or near their life expectancy,” Secretary of State Alex Padilla said. “Some counties use machines that are so old that vendors no longer make replacement parts. Some counties utilize operating systems that are so old that they are no longer supported and security upgrades are not available. While county officials have worked diligently to keep equipment up and running, our democracy faces increasingly sophisticated threats from nefarious actors, both foreign and domestic. The time is now for all California counties to modernize voting equipment.” … Bold added for emphasis.
“The state budget for the current year includes $134.3 million for counties to upgrade or replaceaging voting systems.” … “In a February 12, 2019 hearing of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on HomelandSecurity, DHS Director Christopher Krebs testified that“It will take significant and continualinvestment to ensure that election systems across the nation are upgraded and secure, withvulnerable systems retired. These efforts require a whole of government approach.” Bold added for emphasis.
Smart Voters, do you think rather than California casting a stone at 2024 presidential candidate Donald Trump, maybe the solution for California is to do away with its vulnerable Voting Machines and in 2024 use “Paper Ballots:”Yes or No?
California, let’s make the 2024 election different, use “Paper Ballots” to restore honesty and integrity instead of contributing towards the erosion of voting democracy. Cyber-hackers pose no threat without having program codes to flip “Paper Ballots.”
California STOP casting stones at TRUMP, because your hands are NOT clean and to remove TRUMP’s name off the ballot may cause a “Rise of Smart Voters,” to peacefully protest with just simply writing-in Trump’s name on the 2024 Ballot.
California do you know the State of Colorado received in 2020$7,133,864.00? That’s right the Federal government (EAC) issued $7.3 Mil to Colorado also for Cybersecurity enhancements of its (outdated) Irregular Voting Machines.
Fast forward 2023,Coloradomoves to remove Former President Donald J. Trump off the 2024 Ballot. Colorado your hands aren’t clean either STOP casting stones!
Using “Paper Ballots” will prevent “Rise of the Voting Hackers.”
A timeline of everything that’s happened from the premiere of the Framing Britney Spears documentary through the official termination of her conservatorship
The contentious fight over Britney Spears’ conservatorship entered a new phase after the singer’s scathing testimony in front of Los Angeles probate judge Brenda Penny in June, during which the pop star offered a harrowing account of the last 13 years of her life.
Since 2008, Spears’ life has been controlled by a conservatorship led by her once-estranged father, James “Jamie” Spears. The conservatorship has been credited by some with helping right Spears’ career after a tumultuous 2008 ended with a 5150 involuntary psychiatric hold; since then, Spears has put out hit albums, toured the world, and starred in a Las Vegas residency. But in her testimony, Spears claimed that her father and others enlisted to oversee her life and career have forced her to work ceaselessly; she even goes so far as to compare her seven-days-a-week, no-days-off schedule to sex trafficking. Spears, who also has a personal conservator, Jodi Montgomery, alleged that she was prescribed medication like lithium against her will and told she was not allowed to get married, have another child, or have her IUD removed.
. I’m going to continue to follow this saga and hopefully the system recognizes that it is truly broken and being indifferent to Jeffrey Moffatt, his wife Star and their entire family. – Annie Mae
